72
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Opioids for chronic pain: a knowledge assessment of nonpain specialty providers

, , &
Pages 129-135 | Published online: 10 Mar 2016

Abstract

Introduction

Although the majority of opioids in the US are prescribed by nonpain specialists, these providers often report inadequate training in chronic pain management and opioid prescribing. The extent of health care providers’ knowledge of opioid prescribing for chronic pain has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge about the use of opioids for chronic pain among health care providers seeking pain-focused continuing medical education.

Materials and methods

The study participants (n=131) were recruited at a pain-focused continuing medical education conference for nonpain specialists. Upon commencement of the conference, the KnowPain-50 survey was completed. The survey comprised 50 questions, and 18 questions were related to opioid management. The focus of each opioid question was further categorized as either medicolegal (n=7) or clinical (n=11).

Results

The majority of study participants were male physicians with a mean age of 51.8 years. The proportion of correct responses to the 50-item survey was 72%. The proportion of correct responses to the 32 nonopioid questions was 74%, and the proportion of correct responses to the 18 opioid questions was 69% (P<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of correct responses to the seven medicolegal opioid questions was 74%, and the proportion of correct responses to the eleven clinical opioid questions was 67% (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Health care providers demonstrated gaps in knowledge about the use of opioids for chronic pain. Lower scores on clinically based opioid questions may indicate an opportunity to provide focused educational content about this area of practice. This information could be helpful in designing future educational modules for nonpain providers.

Video abstract

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

http://youtu.be/cY6VWcoaOz4

Introduction

The number of opioid prescriptions in the USA has risen dramatically over the past 25 years, increasing from 76 million in 1991 to 259 million in 2012.Citation1 With the rise in opioid prescriptions, the abuse and diversion of prescription opioids has increased,Citation2 and prescribers face the challenge of balancing the risks and potential benefits of these medications.Citation3 As more than 40% of opioid prescriptions are written by general or family practitioners,Citation4 the opioid prescribing patterns of this group of health care professionals have an important influence on the general public health of US residents.

A majority of primary care providers prescribe opioids for pain.Citation5Citation9 However, many primary care providers find opioid prescribing a significant challenge. For example, many report that their formal training about opioid prescribing was inadequate.Citation5,Citation6,Citation10Citation12 Furthermore, they report concerns about medication side effects, regulatory scrutiny, addiction, and opioid misuse.Citation7,Citation8,Citation10,Citation12Citation16 A recent systematic review found that most physicians do not follow all recommendations regarding safe opioid prescribing, and significant knowledge gaps were identified.Citation17 Primary care providers who have received pain management education after formal training reported the greatest level of confidence with prescribing opioids for chronic pain.Citation18

Few surveys exist that assess the knowledge of nonpain specialty providers about the management of chronic pain. The KnowPain-50 survey was developed specifically to assess pain management education among physicians.Citation19 While the survey covers a broad range of chronic pain topics frequently encountered in the primary care setting, at least one-third of the test specifically addresses opioid prescribing. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge about prescribing opioids for chronic pain among nonpain specialty providers seeking pain-focused continuing medical education (CME).

Methods

Study participants

The participants in this study were health care providers with prescription privileges seeking CME about pain management. All providers were nonpain specialists attending a course entitled “Pain Medicine for the Non-Pain Specialist”. Eligible participants included physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners. A total of 219 health care providers attended the CME course and 131 (60%) completed the KnowPain-50 survey. Three surveys were excluded due to missing data, and the final cohort comprised 128 surveys. Following submission to Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board (IRB) for ethics approval, it was determined that the research activity did not require IRB review in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations (45 CFR 46).Citation20 The Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board did not require written informed consent be obtained from the study participants because all data was de-identified and participation was voluntary.

Study setting

The CME conference was held in March 2013 at a conference center over the course of 3 days; 30-minute lectures were delivered from 8 am to 12:30 pm. Each lecturer presented information using slides projected on a centrally located screen, and participants were allowed to ask questions after each lecture. The conference was sponsored by a tertiary referral medical center’s CME department.

Upon commencement of the conference, the attendees were asked to complete the KnowPain-50 survey. The KnowPain-50 survey was administer in paper format, and all attendees were given adequate time to complete the survey.

Data collection

Demographics and practice characteristics

Participants were asked to report basic demographic data, including age, sex, years of practice, and professional training (eg, physician, physician assistant/nurse practitioner).

KnowPain-50

The KnowPain-50 survey comprised 50 questions.Citation19 Eighteen of the 50 questions were related to opioid management and the remaining 32 questions were related to general knowledge about pain medicine. The focus of each opioid question was further categorized as either medicolegal (n=7) or clinical (n=11). All medicolegal questions contained the words or phrases “investigated”, “illegal”, “not lawful”, “state and federal requirements”, or “federal regulations”. The clinical questions pertained to the clinical management of pain with opioids.

The survey was scored according to the approach described by Harris et al.Citation19 Five questions used a multiple-choice single response format; correct single responses were awarded 5 points and incorrect single responses were awarded 0 points. One of the five multiple-choice questions was a clinical question about opioids (“By far the most common adverse side effect of opioid therapy is:”). The remaining 45 questions were answered using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 6, where 1= strongly agree; 2= agree; 3= somewhat agree; 4= somewhat disagree; 5= disagree; 6= strongly disagree. The correct response for 25 of the Likert questions was the negative (strongly disagree, disagree, somewhat disagree), and the correct response for the remaining 20 Likert questions was the affirmative (strongly agree, agree, somewhat agree). All responses to the Likert questions were converted to a 0- to 5-point scale, where the “strongly agree” or “strongly disagree” correct responses were awarded 5 points, and all other responses were awarded a sequentially diminishing number of points. For example, for questions where the correct response was the negative, 5 points were awarded for the response “6= strongly disagree”, 4 points were awarded for the response “5= disagree”, 3 points were awarded for the response “3= somewhat disagree”, and so on until 0 points were awarded for the response “6= strongly agree”. Alternatively, for questions where the correct response was the affirmative, 5 points were awarded for the response “1= strongly agree”, 4 points were awarded for the response “5= agree”, 3 points were awarded for the response “3= somewhat agree”, and so on until 0 points were awarded for the response “6= strongly disagree”. The maximum possible points for the 50-item survey were 250.

Statistical analysis

The mean and standard deviation (±) (age, years in practice), or proportion (sex) were reported for the demographic and practice characteristics. For the Likert questions, test responses awarded 3–5 points were categorized as correct responses and test responses awarded 0–2 points were categorized as incorrect. The proportion of correct responses was determined for the entire 50-item survey. The proportion of correct responses for the 32 nonopioid questions and 18 opioid questions were compared using the chi-square (χ2) test. The proportion of correct responses for the eleven clinical opioid questions and seven medicolegal opioid questions were compared in a similar manner. The correlations between the demographic (age, sex) and practice characteristics (years in practice) and the proportion of correct responses to the entire 50-item survey, 32 nonopioid questions, and 18 opioid questions were assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ). Two-sided tests were used in all analyses, and the level of significance for all statistical tests was set at 0.05. Statistical analyses were carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Demographic and practice characteristics

The demographic and practice characteristics are shown in . Physicians were predominantly male (68%), whereas nonphysicians were predominantly female (80%). Physicians were also older (51.8±11.4 years) compared with nonphysicians (39.6±10.3 years) (P<0.001).

Table 1 Demographic and practice characteristics

KnowPain-50 responses

shows the frequency of responses to the 32 nonopioid questions. shows the frequency of responses to the seven medicolegal and eleven clinical opioid questions.

Table 2 Proportion of correct responses to 32 nonopioid questions of the KnowPain-50 survey

Table 3 Proportion of correct responses to seven medicolegal and eleven clinical opioid questions of the KnowPain-50 survey

The proportion of correct responses to the entire 50-item survey was 72%. The proportion of correct responses to the 32 nonopioid questions was 74%, and the proportion of correct responses to the 18 opioid questions was 69% (χ2=13.5, P<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of correct responses to the seven medicolegal opioid questions was 74%, and the proportion of correct responses to the eleven clinical opioid questions was 67% (χ2=12.1, P<0.001).

No significant correlations were found between the demographic (age, sex) or practice characteristics (years in practice) and the proportion of correct responses to the entire 50-item survey, the 33 nonopioid questions, or the 17 opioid questions (all Spearman’s ρ<13.0; all P>0.1).

Discussion

One of the main findings of this study was that nonpain specialists seeking CME content about pain medicine scored significantly lower on questions about opioids compared with nonopioid-related questions. When the focus of the opioid questions was further categorized as either medicolegal or clinical, the respondents scored significantly lower on the clinical compared with the medicolegal opioid questions.

The majority of respondents were confident in their ability to pass an investigation of their opioid prescribing practices and in their ability to find and understand state and federal requirements related to prescribing opioids. This is similar to findings by Wolfert et al,Citation16 who reported that 59% of Wisconsin physicians were not concerned about their opioid prescribing practices being investigated. However, over 40% of these physicians responded, “do not know” to specific questions about state and federal requirements, demonstrating poor applied knowledge about these requirements. In a separate survey of family medicine physicians, the levels of concern about addiction, diversion, dependence, regulatory scrutiny, and side effects due to opioid use were investigated.Citation8 In this group of physicians, the responses varied widely, although they tended to have less concerns for regulatory scrutiny and diversion compared with physical dependence and tolerance.Citation8

On the KnowPain-50 survey, participants scored significantly lower on questions about opioids compared with nonopioid-related questions. More specifically, the proportion of correct scores ranged from 45% to 55% on several key clinically related opioid questions, including “Morphine-induced sedation is only a transient problem and will usually clear with continued use”, “The presence of a physiologic basis for pain should be the primary factor when deciding to prescribe opiates”, “I feel comfortable calculating conversion doses of commonly used opioids”, “There is a limit or ‘ceiling’ to the dosage of pure agonist opioids […] that can be used to control a patient’s pain”, and “I believe that analgesic tolerance to opioids usually limits long-term use”. In a study by Lin et al,Citation21 27% of geriatric and internal medicine physicians reported, “I do not know how to prescribe the correct dose” as a reason they hesitated to prescribe opioids. A similar study of Canadian family medicine physicians found that respondents scored higher than 40% on only two of nine knowledge-based questions about the use of prescription opioids.Citation13 A 2005 study of West Virginia family medicine physicians showed similar results in that respondents scored higher than 60% on only six of ten questions.Citation10 Likewise, a small study of primary care providers showed gaps in knowledge related to opioid prescribing where only 69% of questions were correctly answered.Citation12 These research findings are consistent with our current findings and support our previous observationsCitation15 that knowledge about chronic pain has not been consistently associated with knowledge about the use of prescription opioids.Citation5,Citation7,Citation8

While there have been few studies using objective tools to evaluate providers’ knowledge before and after an educational intervention, recognized knowledge gapsCitation6,Citation10,Citation12,Citation13,Citation16,Citation17,Citation21 could be amenable to provider education. The observations from our survey study suggest that the educational interventions should be aimed toward enhancing knowledge about the clinical use of opioids compared with the medicolegal aspects of this form of pain therapy. This is particularly important as primary care providers consistently report low satisfaction with their formal training related to opioid management,Citation5,Citation10Citation12 and rate their clinical knowledge in this area as low.Citation6 A 2007 study of primary care providers by O’Rorke et alCitation18 found that physicians who were most comfortable managing chronic pain had received training after residency. This was recently confirmed by Lalonde et alCitation22 who reported that hours of CME focused on chronic pain were associated with higher scores on the KnowPain-50. These studies suggest that the postgraduate educational interventions may prove particularly effective for primary care providers who manage chronic pain. This supposition is supported by the findings of a recent prospective longitudinal study where primary care practitioners received education about the clinical management of chronic pain including management of patients receiving long-term opioid therapy.Citation23 Compared with baseline, practitioners at 1-year follow-up reported improvements in feeling sufficiently trained to manage patients receiving long-term opioid therapy, improved perceived confidence in prescribing opioids, and improvements in identifying patients at risk for opioid misuse.Citation23

Limitations

This study has limitations. Study participants were seeking CME regarding the management of chronic pain, and were potentially highly motivated to improve their knowledge about the management of chronic pain. Thus, selection bias could influence the generalization of the study observations to other populations of nonpain specialty providers. We did not differentiate by professional degree; thus, differences in professional training could have influenced the study findings. Recent advances in knowledge since publication of the KnowPain-50 suggests that the designated correct response to the question “Chronic opioid therapy has high risk of addiction in adults older than 40 years of age without history of substance abuse” may not be entirely accurate.Citation24Citation26

Conclusion

In summary, nonpain specialty providers demonstrated gaps in knowledge about opioid prescribing. Lower scores on clinically based questions may indicate an opportunity to provide focused educational content about this important area of clinical practice. The key observations from this study could be useful in designing future educational modules for nonpain specialty providers.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • ManchikantiLHelmS2ndFellowsBOpioid epidemic in the United StatesPain Physician2012153 SupplES93822786464
  • DowellDKuninsHVFarleyTAOpioid analgesics – risky drugs, not risky patientsJAMA2013309212219222023700072
  • BallantyneJCLaForgeKSOpioid dependence and addiction during opioid treatment of chronic painPain2007129323525517482363
  • OkieSA flood of opioids, a rising tide of deathsN Engl J Med2010363211981198521083382
  • HutchinsonKMorelandAMdeCWACWeinmanJHorneRExploring beliefs and practice of opioid prescribing for persistent non-cancer pain by general practitionersEur J Pain2007111939816487734
  • KellerCEAshrafiounLNeumannAMVan KleinJFoxCHBlondellRDPractices, perceptions, and concerns of primary care physicians about opioid dependence associated with the treatment of chronic painSubst Abus201233210311322489582
  • NwokejiEDRascatiKLBrownCMEisenbergAInfluences of attitudes on family physicians’ willingness to prescribe long-acting opioid analgesics for patients with chronic nonmalignant painClin Ther200729Suppl2589260218164924
  • PotterMSchaferSGonzalez-MendezEOpioids for chronic nonmalignant pain. Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians in the UCSF/Stanford Collaborative Research Network. University of California, San FranciscoJ Fam Pract200150214515111219563
  • VijayaraghavanMPenkoJGuzmanDMiaskowskiCKushelMBPrimary care providers’ views on chronic pain management among high-risk patients in safety net settingsPain Med20121391141114822846057
  • PonteCDJohnson-TribinoJAttitudes and knowledge about pain: an assessment of West Virginia family physiciansFam Med200537747748015988631
  • UpshurCCLuckmannRSSavageauJAPrimary care provider concerns about management of chronic pain in community clinic populationsJ Gen Intern Med200621665265516808752
  • JamisonRNSheehanKAScanlanEMatthewsMRossELBeliefs and attitudes about opioid prescribing and chronic pain management: survey of primary care providersJ Opioid Manag201410637538225531955
  • AllenMJAsbridgeMMMacdougallPCFurlanADTugalevOSelf-reported practices in opioid management of chronic noncancer pain: a survey of Canadian family physiciansPain Res Manag201318417718423717824
  • BhambBBrownDHariharanJAndersonJBalousekSFlemingMFSurvey of select practice behaviors by primary care physicians on the use of opioids for chronic painCurr Med Res Opin20062291859186516968589
  • HootenWMBruceBKBeliefs and attitudes about prescribing opioids among healthcare providers seeking continuing medical educationJ Opioid Manag20117641742422320023
  • WolfertMZGilsonAMDahlJLClearyJFOpioid analgesics for pain control: Wisconsin physicians’ knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and prescribing practicesPain Med201011342543420002590
  • TournebizeJGibajaVMuszczakAKahnJPAre physicians safely prescribing opioids for chronic noncancer pain? A systematic review of current evidencePain Pract Epub2015410
  • O’RorkeJEChenIGenaoIPandaMCykertSPhysicians’ comfort in caring for patients with chronic nonmalignant painAm J Med Sci200733329310017301587
  • HarrisJMJrFulginitiJVGordonPRKnowPain-50: a tool for assessing physician pain management educationPain Med20089554255418266812
  • US Department of Health and Human ServicesCode of Federal Regulations Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htmlAccessed December 7, 2015
  • LinJJAlfandreDMooreCPhysician attitudes toward opioid prescribing for patients with persistent noncancer painClin J Pain200723979980318075408
  • LalondeLLeroux-LapointeVChoiniereMKnowledge, attitudes and beliefs about chronic noncancer pain in primary care: a Canadian survey of physicians and pharmacistsPain Res Manag201419524125025299473
  • JamisonRNScanlanEMatthewsMLJurcikDCRossELAttitudes of primary care practitioners in managing chronic pain patients prescribed opioids for pain: a prospective longitudinal controlled trialPain Med Epub2015825
  • ChouRFanciulloGJFinePGClinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer painJ Pain200910211313019187889
  • DebIChakrabortyJGangopadhyayPKChoudhurySRDasSSingle-nucleotide polymorphism (A118G) in exon 1 of OPRM1 gene causes alteration in downstream signaling by mu-opioid receptor and may contribute to the genetic risk for addictionJ Neurochem2010112248649619891732
  • DoehringAHentigNGraffJGenetic variants altering dopamine D2 receptor expression or function modulate the risk of opiate addiction and the dosage requirements of methadone substitutionPharmacogenet Genomics200919640741419373123