111
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

A comparison of medley and freestyle performance for national and international swimmers between 1994 and 2011

, , , &
Pages 79-87 | Published online: 26 Mar 2013

Abstract

The change in swim performance over time has been investigated for freestyle, but not for other strokes, such as in the medley. The aim of the study was to examine changes in 200 m and 400 m swim performances in medley swimmers at national (Switzerland) and international level (world championship finals) from 1994 to 2011. The 200 m and 400 m freestyle performances were also analyzed for comparison. Swim performances were analyzed using linear regression and one-way analysis of variance. Male Swiss swimmers improved swim speed by 5.4% in the 200 m medley, 5.3% in the 200 m freestyle, 5.1% in the 400 m medley, and 5.7% in the 400 m freestyle (P < 0.01). Female Swiss swimmers improved swim speed by 4.4% in the 200 m medley, 3.3% in the 200 m freestyle, 3.9% in the 400 m medley, and 3.4% in the 400 m freestyle (P < 0.05). Male swimmers at international level improved swim speed by 4.5% in the 200 m medley, 4.6% in the 200 m freestyle, 2.6% in the 400 m medley, and 2.7% in the 400 m freestyle (P < 0.01). Female swimmers improved swim speed by 4.3% in the 200 m medley, 3.5% in the 400 m medley, and 3.1% in the 400 m freestyle (P ≤ 0.02), but 200 m freestyle performance remained unchanged (P > 0.05). The sex difference in national swim performance remained unchanged at 10.2% ± 0.6% for the 200 m medley (P > 0.05) and increased from 8.8% to 9.8% for the 400 m medley (P < 0.05). In freestyle, it increased from 8.8% to 10.7% in the 200 m, and from 7.8% to 9.4% in the 400 m (P < 0.01). The sex difference in international athletes remained unchanged at 11.1% ± 0.9% in the 200 m medley, 10.1% ± 0.8% in the 400 m medley, 10.0% ± 1.3% in the 200 m, and 9.2% ± 0.6% in the 400 m freestyle (P > 0.05). For the 400 m medley, the sex difference was lower compared to the 200 m medley for national (9.3% ± 0.8% vs 10.2% ± 0.6%, P = 0.01) and for international (10.1% ± 0.8% vs 11.1% ± 0.9%) athletes. For the 400 m freestyle, the sex difference was lower compared to the 200 m freestyle for national (7.9% ± 0.9% vs 9.3% ± 0.8%) and international (9.2% ± 0.6% vs 10.0% ± 1.3%) athletes (P < 0.01), and lower in the freestyle than the medley for the same distances (P < 0.01). Future studies should investigate the reasons for the greater sex difference in the medley than the freestyle.

Introduction

The general goal in competitive short-, middle-, and long-distance sports, such as running, cycling, and swimming, is to finish a given distance in the shortest possible time. Several studies investigated the performance trends in different Olympic disciplines by analyzing the development of world records across years.Citation1Citation4 The development of world records in endurance disciplines, such as cycling, speed skating, triathlon, running, and swimming showed a decrease in race times during the last century.Citation1,Citation4,Citation5 This improvement temporarily stopped or reached a plateau in the 1970s in running,Citation1,Citation3 swimming, and cycling.Citation1 In contrast, for a younger sport, such as triathlon, the improvement plateaued in the 1990s.Citation5 Berthelot et al suggested that the maximum possible physiological sports performance in human species will be reached in one generation and predicted that half of all world records will not be improved more than 0.05% in 2027.Citation1

A historical comparison of female and male world records in different disciplines during the twentieth century showed a nearly doubled higher relative improvement of athletic performance in women compared to men.Citation3,Citation6 Beneke et al predicted that women would decrease the sex difference or even be faster than men in long-distance running.Citation7 Thibault et al investigated world record progression in Olympic events over the 1891–2008 period for 26 athletics events and over the 1963–2008 period for 24 swimming events.Citation4 They showed that the sex difference in world records in the Olympic running and swimming disciplines decreased from ~30% in running and ~23% in swimming at the beginning of the twentieth century to ~11% in running and ~9% in swimming in the 1980s. Afterwards, the sex difference remained stable until 2008. The conclusion was that women may never outrun men.

For freestyle swimming, Nevill et al reported an “accelerated” improvement by 0.010 m/second per year for men and by 0.015 m/second per year for women in the development of world records during the 1960s and 1970s.Citation2 During the 1980s and 1990s, there was a plateau of performance, suggesting that the limits to swimming world records were almost reached. The sex difference in 100 m freestyle performance was 12% in 1957, 10% in 1981, and 11% in 2006.Citation2 Another study investigated the sex difference of the top six finishers in Olympic and world championship finals in the 100 m freestyle and backstroke between 1952 and 2006.Citation8 In accordance with the development of world records in freestyle,Citation2 the sex difference in the 100 m freestyle decreased from 14.3% in the 1950s to 11.5% in the 1980s, and was stable until the year 2000. However, contrary to the expectations of stagnation and an almost reached maximum physiologically possible sports performance,Citation1 the swim times in the different strokes had been improved again in the 2000s by ~2%,Citation9 and the sex difference in the 100 m freestyle increased again to 12.2% between 2000 and 2005.Citation8 This improvement could be partially explained by the development of the new drag-reducing swimsuits in 2000, 2008, and 2009,Citation9 improved pool designs like deeper pools and more effective “antiwave” lane ropes,Citation10 a more efficient training process based on better training control with, eg, the robotic underwater camcorder,Citation10 and also a better evaluation of swimmers by physiological parameters, psychological skills, and emotional competencies.Citation11

The development of swim speed,Citation9,Citation12,Citation13 as well as the sex difference across the years,Citation2,Citation4,Citation8,Citation12,Citation13 has been investigated in freestyleCitation2,Citation8,Citation12,Citation13 and backstroke.Citation8 In another study investigating all five competitive swim disciplines – freestyle, backstroke, breaststroke, butterfly, and individual medley – the gain in swim speed related to the introduction of the new generations of swimsuits in 2000, 2008, and 2009.Citation9 A further study investigated the sex difference in the five competitive swim disciplines, but focused on the mean sex difference in swimming across years.Citation4

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to focus on the change in individual medley swim performance for both men and women across years. The first aim of this study was to investigate the changes in 200 m and 400 m individual medley swim speed for both female and male Swiss swimmers at national level and the international elite competing in the finals at the world championships from 1994 to 2011. The 200 m and 400 m freestyle were analyzed as an internal control and compared to the existing literature. The second aim was to analyze the change in sex difference in swim speed over this studied period for both individual medley and freestyle. We hypothesized, firstly, an improvement in swim speed for both disciplines across the years, and secondly a stability of sex differences in swim performance over the 1994–2011 period.

Materials and methods

The annual top ten freestyle and individual medley performances for both female and male elite Swiss swimmers and the top eight performances from the world championship finals between 1994 and 2011 on the 50 m long course were analyzed in the 200 m and 400 m distances. The data set from this study was obtained from the website of the Swiss Swimming FederationCitation14 and from the website recording information from the European Swimming Federation rankings database.Citation15 The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of St Gallen, Switzerland, with waiver of the requirement for informed consent, given that the study involved the analysis of publicly available data.

Data analysis

In total, data were available from 1994 to 2011 for 144 swim meetings in annual Swiss championships and for 64 finals in the world championships held in the years 1994, 1998, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011. No athlete was included more than once for Swiss swimmers in the same year, because Swiss Swimming Federation lists only the annual best performance of an athlete in the same year. We present the trend of swim speed for the annual best performances of the top ten swimmers in Swiss championships and the top eight swimmers in the finals in the world championship between 1994 and 2011 for both the 200 m and 400 m individual medley and freestyle. Swim times were transformed to swim speed using the equation (swim distance in meters)/(swim time in seconds). To compare women and men, the sex difference was calculated using the equation ([swim speed in women] − [swim speed in men])/([swim speed in men] × 100). To facilitate the reading of the figures, all sex differences were transformed to absolute values. Afterwards, these data were analyzed regarding differences in swim speed between sexes as well as development of the annual performance of the highest swim speed between 1994 and 2011.

Statistical analysis

In order to increase the reliability of data analyses, each set of data was tested for normal distribution as well as for homogeneity of variances in advance of statistical analyses. Normal distribution was tested using a D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test and homogeneity of variances was tested using Levene’s test. To find significant changes in the development of a variable across years, linear regression was used to investigate the trend over time. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze differences between sex difference in individual medley versus freestyle performance for both 200 m and 400 m. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics (version 19; IBM, Chicago, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism (version 5; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) software. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05 (two-sided for t-tests). Data in the text are given as means ± standard deviation.

Results

Changes in swim speed in medley and freestyle across the years

Elite Swiss swimmers of both sexes improved swim speed across the years () in the individual medley for both 200 m () and 400 m () and in freestyle for 200 m () and 400 m (). International elite swimmers at the world championships improved swim speed () in the medley for 200 m () and 400 m (). International elite swimmers improved swim speed in freestyle for the 200 m () and 400 m (), but the women’s 200 m freestyle remained unchanged.

Figure 1 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) medley swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 200 m.

Figure 1 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) medley swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 200 m.

Figure 2 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) medley swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 400 m.

Figure 2 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) medley swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 400 m.

Figure 3 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) freestyle swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 200 m.

Figure 3 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) freestyle swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 200 m.

Figure 4 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) freestyle swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 400 m.

Figure 4 Changes in swim speed of the annual top ten elite Swiss (A) and of the top eight of the world championship (B) freestyle swimmers of both sexes with sex difference in performance from 1994 to 2011 for 400 m.

Table 1 Change in mean swim speed in national swimmers from 1994 to 2011 for women and men

Table 2 Change in mean swim speed at world championships from 1994 to 2011 for women and men

Changes in sex difference in swim speed across the years

The sex difference in swim speed increased in the 200 m and 400 m freestyle and in the 400 m medley, but remained unchanged in the 200 m medley at the national championships (). At the world championships, the sex difference in swim speed remained unchanged over time in freestyle and medley for both the 200 m and 400 m ().

Table 3 Change in sex difference in swim speed at national and world championships from 1994 to 2011

Sex difference in medley and freestyle performance

The sex difference in swim speed in elite national swimmers in the 400 m medley was equal to 9.3% ± 0.8% and was significantly lower (P < 0.01) compared to the 200 m medley (10.2% ± 0.6%) (). Similarly, the mean sex difference in swim speed in the 400 m freestyle was equal to 7.9% ± 0.9% and was significantly lower (P < 0.01) compared to swim speed in the 200 m freestyle (9.3% ± 0.8%). The mean sex difference in swim speed in the 400 m medley was significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared to the 400 m freestyle. Similarly, the mean sex difference in swim speed in the 200 m medley was significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared to the 200 m freestyle.

Figure 5 Sex difference in swim speed for the top ten elite Swiss (A) and for the top eight world championship (B) freestyle and individual medley swimmers for 200 m and 400 m over the 1994–2011 period.

Figure 5 Sex difference in swim speed for the top ten elite Swiss (A) and for the top eight world championship (B) freestyle and individual medley swimmers for 200 m and 400 m over the 1994–2011 period.

The sex difference in swim speed in international elite athletes in the 400 m medley was equal to 10.1% ± 0.8% and was significantly lower (P < 0.01) compared to the 200 m medley (11.1% ± 0.9%) (). Similarly, the mean sex difference in swim speed in the 400 m freestyle was equal to 9.2% ± 0.6% and significantly lower (P < 0.01) compared to swim speed in the 200 m freestyle (10.0% ± 1.3%). The sex difference in swim speed in the 400 m medley was significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared to the 400 m freestyle. The sex difference in swim speed in the 200 m medley was significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared to the 200 m freestyle.

Discussion

The main findings of this study were (1) an improvement of swim speed in the 200 m and 400 m individual medley and freestyle for both men and women during the 1994–2011 period in swimmers at national level originating from Switzerland and similarly in swimmers in the finals in the world championships, with one exception of an unchanged swim-speed performance in the 200 m freestyle in women in the world championship, (2) a stability in the sex difference in swim speed in both disciplines and distances in the world championships and in the 200 m medley in national athletes originating from Switzerland, while sex difference in swim speed in national championships increased in the 400 m medley and in both the 200 m and 400 m freestyle across the years, and (3) a higher sex difference in swim speed in medley compared to freestyle over the same distances in both national athletes and international athletes.

Improvement of swim speed across the years

Elite Swiss swimmers of both sexes improved swim speed in both the 200 m and 400 m individual medley and freestyle across the years. Swim-speed improvements ranged between 5.1% and 5.7% for men and between 3.3% and 4.4% for women. The improvements in swim speed were of a similar extent in both the medley and freestyle. Similarly, international elite athletes competing in the finals in the world championships improved swim speed in both the 200 m and 400 m individual medley across the years. In freestyle, both sexes improved swim speed in the 400 m across the years, but only men improved in the 200 m freestyle. The swim-speed improvements in world championships ranged between 2.6% and 4.6% in men and up to 4.3% for women.

We assume that the improvements in performance in the world championships may be lower compared to national championships. A study compared national and international elite swimmers and showed that international swimmers had higher energetic and biomechanical capacity than national swimmers.Citation16 Another study concluded that the maximum physiologically possible human frontier may almost be reached, because world record progression has flattened.Citation1 We assume, therefore, that swim-speed performance in international elite athletes cannot improve as much as in national elite athletes, because international swimmers may be closer to the maximum physiologically possible human frontier.Citation1 Individual medley is a more complex style than freestyle, because the race contains all four strokes within one race. It has been shown that breaststroke was the most important stroke in the medley in determining the race time, followed by backstroke, butterfly, and freestyle.Citation17 In another study, backstroke correlated most with the final performance in the 200 m individual medley for both sexes.Citation18 However, further investigation is necessary to quantify these differences more exactly in swim-speed improvement in the four medley strokes.

Lätt et al investigated the relationships between performance and biomechanical, anthropometrical, and physiological parameters in 100 m freestyle swimming.Citation19 The study showed significant correlations between performance and biomechanical aspects, such as stroke rate and stroke index; physiological parameters, such as blood lactate accumulation; and anthropometrical variables, such as body height, bone mass, spine bone mineral density, and arm span. Another study investigated body height and body weight in children aged between 6 and 17 years during the twentieth century. During the period of the study, body height increased between 1 and 2 cm per decade, and body weight increased between 0.5 and 1.5 kg per decade.Citation20 A further study predicted that the fastest athletes will become heavier and taller in future, because the mean height of champion swimmers in the 100 m freestyle had increased by 11.4 cm since 1912.Citation21 Further investigations would be necessary to analyze anthropometrical changes in swimmers originating from Switzerland across the period of the study.

Apart from changes in anthropometric characteristics,Citation19 improvements in training,Citation22 physiological variables,Citation19 psychological aspects,Citation23 and sports nutrition,Citation24 developments in material science,Citation9 such as the new generations of swimsuits, may also have had an effect on swim speed during this time period.Citation9 Berthelot et al showed a gain in swim speed between 2000 and 2009 between ~1.9% and ~2.6% in men, and between ~1.3% and ~2.3% in women.Citation9 In the 200 m distance, the swim-speed improvements tended to be higher in the medley than in the freestyle for both sexes, which is in line with present findings for women. The improvements due to wearing new swimsuits were related to a gain in buoyancy and drag reduction,Citation25,Citation26 a decrease in oxygen uptake,Citation27,Citation28 and minute ventilation.Citation28 Wearing a wetsuit was allowed in Swiss competitions during the period of the study, even though the wetsuits had no Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA) approval label. More restrictive rules were given for national championships, and even more so for FINA competitions.Citation29 From January 1, 2010, FINA prohibited the wearing of full-body wetsuits.Citation30 However, this prohibition for wetsuits seemed not to impair swim-speed performance, perhaps partially because FINA authorized the use of the new angled starting blocks with an extended length of the platform and a higher angled surface to ground.Citation31 Two recent studies compared the starting performance of the new angled starting block compared to the traditional starting block and concluded that the new kick start was significantly faster than the older grab start.Citation32,Citation33

Changes in sex difference in swim performance across the years

The sex difference in swim speed in elite Swiss swimmers in the 200 m individual medley was unchanged at ~10.2%, while it increased to values between 8.6% and 10.7% in freestyle and the 400 m medley, respectively. The sex differences in world championships were unchanged between 9.2% and 11.1% for both the 200 m and 400 m medley and freestyle, respectively. A study on the US Masters Swimming Championships between 1991 and 1995 reported a decrease in the sex differences with increasing race distances, which is in line with our results.Citation34 The sex difference in freestyle swimming was 19% for 50 m and decreased to 11% for 1500 m. Another study investigated the sex difference in the 3.8 km swim in Ironman triathlons between 2006 and 2008 and reported a sex difference of ~12%.Citation35 Interestingly, a previous study investigating the 26.4 km open-water ultraswim Marathon Swim in Lake Zurich, held in Switzerland between 1987 and 2011, showed no sex difference in performance between women and men.Citation12 Similarly, another study investigating the 32 km English Channel Swim between England and France between 1900 and 2010 found no sex difference in the mean swimming time of the successful swimmers.Citation13

The decrease in sex difference with increasing swim distance may be explained by the positive correlation between upper-body power and freestyle swimming in 50 m time trials up to 400 m distances.Citation36 However, the correlation generally decreased with increasing race distance.Citation36 This might be a reason why the sex difference was higher in the 200 m short-distance races, because men were found to have significantly greater muscle power than women.Citation37 Another study showed that women had a lower energy cost of swimming in freestyle, which could be an advantage in the longer distances compared to men. The higher swim economy in women was due to a different distribution of body density and surface area compared to men, which results in lower underwater torque in women.Citation38

An analysis of the 100 m, 200 m, and 400 m freestyle swimming world records from 1957 to 2006 showed a stable sex difference at 11% for the 100 m, 10% for the 200 m, and 9% for the 400 m freestyle.Citation2 This study is in line with the present findings of a stable sex difference in world championships. The fact that the sex difference in the 400 m medley, 200 m, and 400 m freestyle increased across the years while the sex difference in the 200 m medley remained unchanged in Swiss championships might be due to the introduction of the new generations of Fastskin suits, which was followed by significant gain in swim-speed performance in the years 2000, 2008, and 2009.Citation9 In the 200 m medley, both sexes showed a similar gain in swim speed, while men had a higher gain in swim speed in the 400 m, the 200 m, and the 400 m freestyle.Citation9 Further investigation would be necessary to clarify the unstable sex difference in Swiss championships compared to the stable sex difference in world championships. We assume that there might be a higher fluctuation in annual swim-speed performance at the national level compared to the international level, because of the lower number of athletes at the international level and therefore lower selection pressure.

Sex difference in freestyle and medley

The mean sex difference during the 1994–2011 period was lower in the 400 m events than in the 200 m for both medley and freestyle in Swiss and world championships. Furthermore, the sex difference was lower in freestyle than medley in the same distances. We presume that the lower sex difference in freestyle compared to the medley has multifactorial causes. It has been shown that freestyle was the most economic swimming stroke, followed by backstroke, butterfly and breaststroke.Citation39 In another study, women had higher swim economy than men in freestyle because of lower underwater torque due to a different distribution of body density.Citation38 Women might benefit more from their lower energy cost in swimming freestyle, the most economic swim stroke. As discussed before, men were found to have more muscle mass than women,Citation37 and upper-body power was positively correlated with freestyle swim-speed performance up to 400 m.Citation36 We assume that the four changes of stroke during medley races may be an advantage for men, because different muscle groups can be used after the stroke changes during the medley races, and this may result in an advantage over short-distance races due to the higher muscle mass in men. However further investigation is needed to explain the sex difference in freestyle and medley.

Conclusion

These results showed that female and male swimmers at the national level originating from Switzerland and international elite athletes in world championships improved swim speed in the freestyle and individual medley in the 200 m and the 400 m from 1994 to 2011, with the exception of women in the 200 m freestyle at the world championships. The sex difference in swim speed in elite swimmers at national level in the 200 m medley was unchanged, while it increased in the freestyle and 400 m medley across years. At the world championships, the sex difference was unchanged in both distances and disciplines. At national and international level, the sex difference in performance in the 200 m medley was higher than in the 400 m medley and freestyle. Furthermore, the sex difference was lower in the freestyle compared to the medley over the same distances. The improvements might be related to improvements in training, changes in anthropometric characteristics, and the development of the new swimsuits. Future studies should investigate the trend in swim speed and the sex difference in other strokes. Furthermore, the reasons for a greater sex difference in the medley than the freestyle should be investigated.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • BerthelotGThibaultVTaffletMThe citius end: world records progression announces the completion of a brief ultra-physiological questPLoS One200832e155218253499
  • NevillAWhyteGHolderRPeyrebruneMAre there limits to swimming world records?Int J Sports Med200728121012101717534781
  • LippiGBanfiGFavaloroERittwegerJMaffulliNUpdates on improvement of human athletic performance: focus on world records in athleticsBr Med Bull200887171518723588
  • ThibaultVGuillaumeMBerthelotGWomen and men in sport performance: the gender gap has not evolved since 1983J Sports Sci Med20109221422324149688
  • LepersRAn analysis of Hawaii Ironman performances in elite triathletes from 1981 to 2007Med Sci Sports Exerc200840191828183418799994
  • WhippBWardSWill women soon outrun men?Nature19923556355251731197
  • BenekeRLeithäuserRMDoppelmayrMWomen will do it in the long runBr J Sports Med200539741015976160
  • SeilerSDe KoningJFosterCThe fall and rise of the gender difference in elite anaerobic performance 1952–2006Med Sci Sports Exerc200739353454017473780
  • BerthelotGLenSHellardPTechnology and swimming: 3 steps beyond physiologyMater Today (Kidlington)201013114651
  • ColwinCLooking back, looking aheadMcEntireCHawkinsSWentworthJBreakthrough SwimmingChampaign (IL)Human Kinetics2002217228
  • SmithDNorrisSHoggJPerformance evaluation of swimmers: scientific toolsSports Med200232953955412096928
  • EichenbergerEKnechtleBKnechtlePSex difference in open-water ultra-swim performance in the longest freshwater lake swim in Europe: sex difference in ultra-swimmingJ Strength Cond Res EpubJune282012
  • EichenbergerEKnechtleBKnechtlePRüstCRosemannTLepersRBest performances by men and women open-water swimmers during the ‘English Channel Swim’ from 1900 to 2010J Sports Sci201230121295130122830602
  • Fédération Suisse de Natation (FSN)Rekorde/Bestenlisten Available from: http://rankings.fsn.chAccessed May 7, 2012
  • SwimRankings.net [homepage on the Internet]Veranstaltungen Available from: http://www.swimrankings.net/index.php?page=meetSelectAccessed December 1, 2012
  • CostaMBragadaJMejiasJTracking the performance, energetics and biomechanics of international versus national level swimmers during a competitive seasonEur J Appl Physiol2012112381182021674245
  • MasonBCossorJWhat can we learn from competition analysis at the 1999 Pan Pacific Swimming Championships?HongYJohnsDPSandersRProceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Biomechanics in SportsJune 25–30, 2000Hong Kong, ChinaHong KongChinese University Press20007582
  • SaavedraJEscalanteYGarcia-HermosoAArellanoRNavarroFA twelve-year analysis of pacing strategies in 200- and 400-m individual medley in international swimming competitionsJ Strength Cond Res201226123289329622222324
  • LättEJürimäeJMäestuJPhysiological, biomechanical and anthropometrical predictors of sprint swimming performance in adolescent swimmersJ Sports Sci Med2010939840424149633
  • KagawaMTaharaYMojiKNakaoRAoyagiKHillsASecular changes in growth among Japanese children over 100 years (1900–2000)Asia Pac J Clin Nutr201120218018921669586
  • CharlesJBejanAThe evolution of speed, size and shape in modern athleticsJ Exp Biol2009212Pt 152419242519617435
  • IssurinVNew horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodizationSports Med201040318920620199119
  • PsychountakiMZervasYCompetitive worries, sport confidence, and performance ratings for young swimmersPercept Mot Skills2000911879411011876
  • StellingwerffTMaughanRBurkeLNutrition for power sports: middle-distance running, track cycling, rowing, canoeing/kayaking, and swimmingJ Sports Sci20112917989
  • MollendorfJTerminAOppenheimEPendergastDEffect of swim suit design on passive dragMed Sci Sports Exerc20043661029103515179173
  • TomikawaMNomuraTRelationships between swim performance, maximal oxygen uptake and peak power output when wearing a wetsuitJ Sci Med Sport200912231732218083064
  • ChatardJCWilsonBEffect of fastskin suits on performance, drag, and energy cost of swimmingMed Sci Sports Exerc20084061149115418460989
  • TrappeTPeaseDTrappeSTroupJBurkeEPhysiological responses to swimming while wearing a wet suitInt J Sports Med19961721111148833712
  • Fédération Suisse de Natation (FSN)Die Regeln der FINA für Wettkämpfe im Schwimmen Available from: http://www.fsn.ch/Portaldata/1/Resources/dokumente/reglemente/swimming/731-d.pdfAccessed May 7, 2012
  • Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA)PR59 – FINA bureau meeting Available from: http://www.fina.org/project/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2543&Itemid=107Accessed May 7, 2012
  • OmegaFINA approves new OMEGA start blocks for official swimming competitions [press release]Biel/Bienne, SwitzerlandOmega4232008 Available from: http://www.omegawatches.com/press/press-release-detail/978Accessed May 23, 2012
  • BielKFischerSKibeleAKinematic analysis of take-off performance in elite swimmers: new OSB11 versus traditional starting blockKjendliePStallmanRCabriJProceedings of the 11th International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine in SwimmingJune 16–19, 2010Oslo, Norway
  • HondaKSinclairPMasonBPeaseDA biomechanical comparison of elite swimmers start performance using the traditional track start and the new kick startKjendliePStallmanRCabriJProceedings of the 11th International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine in SwimmingJune 16–19, 2010Oslo, Norway
  • TanakaHSealsDAge and gender interactions in physiological functional capacity: insight from swimming performanceJ Appl Physiol19978238468519074973
  • LepersRMaffiulettiNAge and gender interactions in ultra-endurance performance: insight from triathlonMed Sci Sports Exerc201143113413921169751
  • HawleyJWilliamsMRelationship between upper body anaerobic power and freestyle swimming performanceInt J Sports Med1991121152030051
  • GursoyRSex differences in relations of muscle power lung function, and reaction time in athletesPercept Mot Skills2010110371472020681326
  • PendergastDDiPramperoPCraigAWilsonDRennieDQuantitative analysis of the front crawl in men and womenJ Appl Physiol1977433475479914719
  • BarbosaTFernandesRKeskinenKEvaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokesInt J Sports Med2006271189489916612740