Cataract Surgical Planning Using Online Software vs Traditional Methods: A Time/Motion and Quality of Care Study

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study is to compare two methods of preoperative planning for placement of intraocular implants: traditional paper documentation/electronic scans versus a novel online planning software. The aim was to compare the time required and number of data points manually transcribed with each method and to explore whether differences in surgical accuracy could be identified between the two methods in a small sample of 40 patients.

Methods

In this study, preoperative planning was performed twice for all enrolled patients: once through the traditional method and once using an online planning software system. The total time spent and number of data points manually transferred were recorded for each method.

Results

Of the 40 patients enrolled, the mean total surgical planning time was 239 ± 190 seconds for the traditional method vs 63 ± 31 seconds with the online planning software (P<0.00001). The mean number of data points transcribed was 7.2 ± 7.2 for the traditional method vs 0.9 ± 1.7 with the online planning software (P<0.0000001). No statistically significant differences were noted in terms of accuracy of prediction of the spherical equivalent surgical outcome.

Conclusion

In comparison to traditional methods, a significant reduction in time required for surgical planning and the manual transcription of data points was noted when a comprehensive online surgical planning software was used. This has important implications for the efficiency and likely the safety of surgical planning.

Graphical abstract

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/0mJ_iFimGwI

Keywords:

• biometry
• accuracy
• intraocular lens; errors

View correction statement:

Cataract Surgical Planning Using Online Software vs Traditional Methods: A Time/Motion and Quality of Care Study [Corrigendum]

Data Sharing Statement

No deidentified participant data is being disclosed in this manuscript. No other study documents or participant information will be released.

Acknowledgments

Leslie Lemieux assisted in the collection of data in this study.

Disclosure

Miss Tarika Gujral has nothing to disclose. Dr John Hovanesian reports grants, personal fees from Zeiss, during the conduct of the study.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from Alcon.