Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9: 1367–1372.
On page 1367, the final sentence of the Introduction which reads:
“The purpose of this study was simply to compare the CDE between the single Centurion and single Infiniti phacoemulsification systems in a larger number of cases to see which one uses less CDE under similar age, sex, and complication rate (P>0.05) among five surgeons in one surgical center.” Should read:
“The purpose of this study is to compare the mean CDE and complication rate of the Centurion and Infiniti phacoemulsification systems.”
On page 1370 there were errors in both and . The correct figures are presented below:
Figure 1 Comparison of CDE between Centurion system and Infiniti system among five surgeons.
Figure 2 Comparison of CDE between Centurion system and Infiniti system across age (years) among five surgeons combined.
