Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of epithelial mesenchymal transition-related protein expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to examine the patterns of expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The clinicopathological and prognostic value of these markers was also evaluated.

Methods

We detected the expression status of three EMT-related proteins, ie, E-cadherin, vimentin, and N-cadherin, by immunohistochemistry in consecutive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma specimens from 96 patients.

Results

The frequency of loss of the epithelial marker E-cadherin, and acquisition of mesenchymal markers, vimentin and N-cadherin, in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was 43.8%, 37.5% and 57.3%, respectively. Altered expression of EMT markers was associated with aggressive tumor behavior, including lymph node metastasis, undifferentiated-type histology, advanced tumor stage, venous invasion, and shorter overall survival. Moreover, loss of E-cadherin was retained as an independent prognostic factor for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the EMT process is associated with tumor progression and a poor outcome in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and inhibition of EMT might offer novel promising molecular targets for the treatment of affected patients.

Keywords:

• intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
• epithelial-mesenchymal transition
• expression
• prognosis
• immunohistochemistry

Introduction

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary cancer of the liver, and arises from malignant transformation of epithelial tissue in the small bile ducts. The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is very poor, with median survival for patients who do not undergo surgery being 6 months, and the 5-year survival rate for patients following complete resection being only 20%–40%.^1,2 Being of different embryological origin, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma differs from extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the liver in both morphology and molecular background.³ In recent decades, the incidence of and mortality from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has progressively increased, whilst being stable or slightly decreased for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.⁴ Different stem cell niches have been identified recently in the liver and biliary tree, which might partly account for the difference between intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.⁵ Specific novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is essential for phenotypic transition during embryogenesis and wound healing, and could also be reactivated during the malignant progression of numerous cancers.⁶ The process of EMT is characterized by loss of the epithelial marker, E-cadherin, abnormal nuclear location of β-catenin, and loss of acquired mesenchymal markers, such as vimentin and N-cadherin. Snail, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and Twist are considered to be master genes triggering EMT by strong repression of E-cadherin.⁷ Expression of EMT biomarkers has been investigated in various cancers, including those of gastric origin.⁸ However, the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of multiple EMT-related proteins in cholangiocarcinoma has not as yet been confirmed.

In this study, we investigated the expression of EMT markers in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and their relationship with clinical features and prognosis was also determined.

Materials and methods

Patients

The study subjects included 96 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, who were surgically treated at Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China, and the First Affiliated Hospital, Bengbu Medical College, Anhui, China, from 2002 to 2008. All tumors were confirmed pathologically. No patients underwent chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. Postoperative adjuvant treatments were undertaken in a subset of patients with recurrence as follows: 12 cases received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy; seven cases received radiotherapy, and five received both treatment modalities. Cases combined with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were excluded. TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) stages were based on pathological classification. Follow-up information was collected, including patient outcome and time interval between the date of surgical resection and cancer-related death. Patients lost to follow-up and those who died from causes other than cancer were considered as censored data. The median follow-up period was 23 (range 9–61) months. The study was approved by the institutional review board of our institutions, and informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Immunohistochemistry

Expression of EMT marker proteins, ie, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) was detected by immunohistochemistry. Briefly, 4 μm thick sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and washed with phosphate-buffered saline. They were then treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 20 minutes at room temperature to inactivate endogenous peroxidases, followed by microwave antigen retrieval in 10 mM citric acid (pH 6.0) for 10 minutes. The slides were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 minutes and incubated with the mouse monoclonal anti-human E-cadherin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, Clone G-10, #sc-8426, at 1:100 dilution), mouse monoclonal antihuman vimentin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Clone V9, #sc-6260, at 1:100 dilution), mouse monoclonal antihuman vimentin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Clone D-4, #sc-8424, at 1:100 dilution), and mouse monoclonal antihuman α-SMA antibody (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Fremont, CA, # BM0002, at 1:100 dilution) overnight at 4°C. Immunostaining was carried out using the Envision kit (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine substrate and was then counterstained with hematoxylin. To create a positive tumor control marker, slides were incubated with rabbit anticytokeratin (DAKO) at 1:100. Mouse IgG at the same concentration instead of the primary antibodies was used as negative controls. Immunohistochemistry staining was evaluated according to a previous study of EMT markers.⁸ The sample was recorded in 200× fields, five different fields, and at least 1000 tumor cells were recorded in each sample. Cases were regarded as positive for each antibody when immunoreactivity was present in more than 10% of the cancer cells.

Statistical analysis

The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the relationship between clinicopathological variables and expression of individual EMT-related proteins. The nonparametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient was applied to analyze for correlations between the expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, N-cadherin. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for univariate analysis of EMT markers to predict overall patient survival. A multivariate analysis of clinicopathological variables and EMT markers was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 16.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to analyze the protein expression of the epithelial protein marker, E-cadherin, and the mesenchymal markers, vimentin and N-cadherin, in tumor specimens. Representative immunohistochemical results are shown in Figure 1. Epithelial E-cadherin protein loss frequency was observed in 43.8% (42/96) of tumors, and acquired mesenchymal vimentin and N-cadherin protein overexpression frequency was seen in 37.5% (36/96) and 57.3% (55/96) of tumors, respectively.

Figure 1 Representative immunohistochemical images of three epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (A) E-cadherin was strongly expressed in the plasma membrane of the tumor cells; (B) demonstration of loss of membranous E-cadherin in tumor cells; (C) negative N-cadherin expression with a positivity less than 10%; (D) demonstration of N-cadherin in the membrane and cytoplasm of tumor cells; (E) negative expression of vimentin in cancer cells while stromal cells were positively stained; and (F) acquired vimentin expression in cancer cells.

Table 1 Correlations between epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers and clinicopathological characteristics

	E-cadherin			Vimentin			N-cadherin			With two EMT markers			With three EMT markers
	Absent (n = 42)	Present (n = 54)	P value	Absent (n = 60)	Present (n = 36)	P value	Absent (n = 41)	Present (n = 55)	P value	Absent (n = 57)	Present (n = 39)	P value	Absent (n = 69)	Present (n = 27)	P value
Age (years)
<65	25	28	0.453	29	24	0.080	22	31	0.792	30	23	0.539	35	18	0.158
≥65	17	26		31	12		19	24		27	16		34	9
Gender
Female	13	17	0.956	19	11	0.909	13	17	0.933	17	13	0.716	20	10	0.444
Male	29	37		41	25		28	38		40	26		49	17
Tumor size
<5 cm	31	43	0.501	48	26	0.380	29	45	0.201	46	28	0.308	53	21	0.919
≥5 cm	11	11		12	10		12	10		11	11		16	6
Lymph node metastasis
Negative	20	42	0.002	46	16	0.001	28	34	0.512	43	19	0.007	50	12	0.010
Positive	22	12		14	20		13	21		14	20		19	15
Vascular invasion
Negative	24	40	0.081	44	20	0.074	32	32	0.041	43	21	0.028	48	16	0.336
Positive	18	14		16	16		9	23		14	18		21	11
Neural invasion
Negative	24	37	0.251	42	19	0.090	26	35	0.982	40	21	0.103	46	15	0.309
Positive	18	17		18	17		15	20		17	18		23	12
pTNM stage
I and II	14	34	0.040	37	11	0.030	19	29	0.536	35	13	0.007	39	9	0.041
III and IV	28	20		23	25		22	26		22	26		30	18
Histology
Differentiated	16	35	0.009	40	11	0.001	23	28	0.614	37	14	0.005	44	7	0.001
Undifferentiated	26	19		20	25		18	27		20	25		25	20

Abbreviation: TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.

The relationships between altered EMT protein expression and clinicopathological parameters are summarized in Table 1. Loss of E-cadherin and acquisition of vimentin were found to be significantly related to lymph node metastasis, advanced pTNM stage, and poorly differentiated type. In addition, N-cadherin-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas had a higher recurrence rate of vascular invasion (41.8%, 23/55) than N-cadherin negative tumors (22.0%, P = 0.041).

The Spearman rank correlation test showed that the three EMT-related proteins were closely related to each other in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Loss of E-cadherin was negatively correlated with vimentin (r = −0.705, P = 0.001) and N-cadherin (r = −0.422, P = 0.001) expression. Membranous N-cadherin expression also had a statistically significant correlation with increased vimentin expression (r = 0.277, P = 0.006). No significant relationship between stromal α-SMA expression and EMT markers was observed in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumors.

Overall survival was determined using the log-rank test with respect to expression of the three EMT markers (Figure 2). In terms of the epithelial marker, E-cadherin, loss was found to be significantly associated with a poor outcome. This was also true for upregulation of the mesenchymal proteins, vimentin and N-cadherin. The three EMT markers and four other statistically significant prognostic factors (lymph node metastasis, venous invasion, pTNM stage, and histology) identified in univariate analysis were entered in the multivariate analysis. Among these factors, loss of E-cadherin expression and lymph node metastasis were shown to be independent prognostic indicators in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. However, vimentin and N-cadherin expression had no prognostic significance in multivariate analysis (Table 2).

Figure 2 Survival analysis of three epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method determined by the log-rank test. E-cadherin loss (A) and upregulation of mesenchymal proteins vimentin (B) and N-cadherin (C) were found to be significantly associated with a poor outcome. There was also a trend toward coexistence of multiple epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers (D and E) associated with much more shorter overall survival.

Table 2 Multivariate analysis of predictive factors for overall survival

Variables	OS
	HR	95% CI	P value
LN metastasis
Positive versus negative	2.416	1.166–5.003	0.018
Vascular invasion
Positive versus negative	1.222	0.703–2.124	0.478
pTNM stage
I and II versus III and IV	1.192	0.613–2.319	0.604
Histology
Differentiated versus undifferentiated	0.954	0.535–1.701	0.873
E-cadherin
Present versus absent	0.157	0.061–0.402	0.001
Vimentin
Present versus absent	0.678	0.304–1.515	0.344
N-cadherin
Present versus absent	1.320	0.732–2.379	0.356

Abbreviations: HR, hazards ratio; LN, lymph node; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval.

Among the positive cases, 39 tumors demonstrated coexistence of two EMT markers and 27 cases showed coexistence of three EMT markers. As seen in Table 1 and Figure 2, there was a trend towards coexistence of multiple EMT markers associated with lymph node metastasis, pTNM stage, histology, and shorter overall survival. Furthermore, there was also a significant association between coexistence of two EMT markers and vascular invasion.

Discussion

During progression of cancer, induction of EMT has been associated with acquisition of stemness properties, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy.⁹ The clinical and prognostic significance of EMT has been reported in various human cancers.

Although immunostaining of individual EMT markers, such as E-cadherin and β-catenin, has been reported in several previous studies involving small sample sizes,^10,11 the expression profile of multiple EMT markers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has not been clarified.

Circumstantial evidence supports EMT being closely associated with progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Seol et al¹² analyzed the gene profiling of nine cancer cell lines generated from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and found upregulation of the EMT-related proteins, vimentin and Twist1. Dos Santos et al¹³ examined the proteomic profiling of microdissected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells, and found that the protein alterations in these cells were very similar to those reported in the A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cell line during EMT induced by transforming growth factor beta, which has been demonstrated to be increased in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.^14,15 It has also been reported that reduced expression of beta-catenin is detected in a majority of biliary tumors, and their downregulation correlates with high-grade malignancy.¹⁶

In this study, we evaluated immunohistochemically the expression of three established EMT biomarkers which have been most frequently investigated in 96 consecutive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma specimens, and found that downregulation of E-cadherin and upregulation of vimentin and N-cadherin was associated with aggressive biological behavior, including poor differentiation, advanced stage, positive lymph node involvement, and venous infiltration. Our findings are consistent with the findings of previous researchers.^10,11

We extended the previous studies to confirm that expression of three EMT proteins was closely related in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis also showed that aberrant expression of the individual EMT-related proteins showed a trend toward poorer outcomes. Furthermore, loss of E-cadherin had an independent prognostic value in predicting outcomes in patients with primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Taken together, our findings suggest that the EMT process may be an important molecular event during progression and metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which is in concordance with several published in vitro studies. Interaction of carcinoma and stromal cells plays an important role in the regulation of EMT in carcinomas. Schulte et al¹⁷ revealed significant correlations between stromal myofibroblasts and the EMT markers, Snail and Slug. However, in this study, using α-SMA as a marker for stromal myofibroblasts, no statistically significant relationship was observed between stromal myofibroblasts and EMT markers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Given the aggressive nature and lack of effective adjuvant treatment modalities for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, complete surgical resection is still the only therapeutic option for patients with the disease. However, even patients undergoing radical surgical resection are still at high risk for recurrence, and postoperative survival remains unsatisfactory. Considering that the EMT phenotype is closely related to aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, we suggest that EMT might not only provide a new classification scheme, but might also offer a promising therapeutic target for patients with the disease. A couple of studies have proposed strategies to inhibit EMT. Li et al¹⁸ suggested that application of miR-214 might inhibit EMT by directly targeting the Twist gene in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Araki et al¹⁹ also indicated that transforming growth factor beta could be regarded as a candidate target to reverse EMT in biliary tumors.

Conclusion

In the present study, we have found that expression of EMT-related proteins is closely associated with tumor progression and a poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, suggesting that the EMT process may act as an important molecular event during the progression and metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We propose that EMT markers would have clinical implications for clinical classification; furthermore, inhibition of EMT might offer a novel promising target for the treatment of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.