Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to know the patients’ point of view on the monitoring of vitamin K-antagonist (VKA) therapy by means of a point of care testing (POCT), ie, using a portable coagulometer by self-testing at home. At first, patients had prothrombin time (PT) international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring at a thrombosis center; afterward, they were shifted to self-testing at home. An interview was done to evaluate the patients’ point of view on the two monitoring periods.
Patients and methods
A total of 92 oral anticoagulated patients were enrolled. The questionnaire contained nine questions that elicited a maximum of five closer answers that were arranged in increasing levels of satisfaction: very little, little, enough, much and completely. Percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR) and adverse events were compared during the two periods of conventional monitoring and self-testing.
Results
The period of conventional monitoring was shorter than that of self-testing (p<0.0001), and the median TTR was satisfactory but lower than that of self-testing (p<0.0001). A total of 85% of the patients were satisfied with self-testing at home. In all, 83% and 73% (p=0.06) of patients felt comfortable about side effects while measuring the PT INR at both home and the thrombosis center, respectively. During the self-testing period, quality of life was improved in 87% of the patients. The cost of test strips was medium–high for 89% of the patients, and 75% of them stated that it was worth improving their quality of life. A switch from VKA to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) was proposed to 24% of the patients, but 68% of them declined because they felt more comfortable monitoring their oral anticoagulant therapy by POCT.
Conclusion
VKA monitoring using POCT at home may play a role in improving the patients’ quality of life and may be considered as an alternative to the use of DOAC at least in certain settings of patients.
Author contributions
All the authors were involved in study design, data acquisition and data analysis/interpretation; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and reviewed the final version and gave approval for submission.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.