103
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Comparison of Different Adherence Measures in Adolescent Outpatients with Depressive Disorder

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1065-1072 | Published online: 24 Jun 2020
 

Abstract

Purpose

Adolescent depression can have a chronic course; hence, the importance of adherence to antidepressant medication for successful treatment outcomes is emphasized. This study aimed to examine different adherence measures and identify clinical factors that influence adherence in adolescent depression.

Patients and Methods

A prospective study was conducted for patients diagnosed with depressive disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fourth Edition from outpatient psychiatric settings at Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital. Patient demographics were obtained from a questionnaire, interview, and review of chart records. Adherence was assessed by four methods (Medication Event Monitoring System [MEMS], pill count, clinical rating scale, and patient’s self-report). The Toronto Side Effect Scale was used to evaluate side effects, and specific depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Childhood Depression Inventory–Korean version. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support was administered to analyze social support, and the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form was used to evaluate parental stress levels. We used concordance correlation analysis to evaluate the relationship among the four adherence measures and the relationship between adherence level and clinical factors.

Results

Overall, the study enrolled 48 outpatients (mean age 16.33±1.93 years). The mean duration of illness was 1.27±2.17 years. Adherence rates for MEMS, clinician rating scale, pill count, and self-report after conversion to dichotomous measures were 67.5%, 48.9%, 60.0%, and 56.3%, respectively. Only the duration of illness remained significantly correlated with MEMS (r = 0.510, p =0.001).

Conclusion

Pill count exhibited a higher degree of agreement with MEMS adherence than the other two adherence measures, possibly indicating that pill count may be a considerably reliable measure of adherence. Furthermore, MEMS adherence was positively correlated with disease duration, suggesting that the longer the duration of illness, the higher the adherence.

Acknowledgment

The abstract of this research has been presented at the 66th annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (grant numbers NRF- 2017R1D1A1B03028672) and a grant from Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Disclosure

Dr Young Eun Mok reports grants from National Research Foundation of Korea, grants from Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., during the conduct of the study. Prof. Dr. Moon-soo Lee reports grants from Korea Research Foundation, grants from Boryung Pharmaceutical company, during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.