113
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Factor Analysis and Psychometric Properties Adaption of Chinese Version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10)

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 2027-2034 | Published online: 22 Oct 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

To translate and validate the DES-10 into Chinese and adapt the DES-10 among Chinese prostate cancer patients. To explore the impact of demographic data on the SDM of Chinese prostate cancer patients.

Methods

Data were collected from December 2019 to January 2020 from four hospitals among prostatic cancer patients in Henan Province, by convenience sampling method. A demographic questionnaire, DES-10, and 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) were administered. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to test the content, construct, reliability, and concurrent validity of the translated DES-10. Then, Pearson’s correlation, t-test, and analysis of variance were used to test the demographic difference of DES-10.

Results

A total of 380 prostatic cancer patients completed the survey (96% response rate). The total score of DES-10 was 71.16±17.14. The Cronbach’s ɑ coefficient was 0.87. Single factor structure was confirmed by exploratory factor analysis (explaining 50.14% of the variance). Model fitting indexes (RMSEA=0.07, CMIN/DF=2.92) were acceptable. The DES-10 scale showed good validity with the SDM-Q-9 as the criterion. Age, marital status, homeplace, and household monthly income could affect the shared decision-making of prostatic cancer patients.

Conclusion

The DES-10 was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable scale to assess the prostatic cancer patient’s engagement in health care decision-making. And it is culturally appropriate for use in China. The influence of age, marital status, homeplace, and household monthly income should be considered in promoting patients’ participation in shared decision-making.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the study participants in this study. Feijie Wang and Lijie Huang are co-first authors for this study.

Disclosure

The authors stated that they have no conflicts of interest for this work.

Additional information

Funding

There is no funding supports this study.