Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the effect of mindfulness on flow at the organizational and individual levels. Based on perseverative cognition theory, we introduced work-related rumination (affective rumination and problem-solving pondering) as the transmitter in these processes.
Methods
This study conducted a three-wave longitudinal survey. The data of 458 employees and 114 leaders were collected from three software parks in China. Multilevel structural equation modeling and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method were adopted to test all hypotheses.
Results
Employee mindfulness and leader mindfulness help reduce affective rumination by employees and increase their problem-solving pondering and flow experiences. Affective rumination and problem-solving pondering partially mediate the relationship between leader and employee mindfulness and flow. Leader mindfulness moderates the effects of employees’ mindfulness on their affective rumination and problem-solving pondering.
Conclusion
Our findings contribute to the current literature on mindfulness, work-related rumination and flow experience and extend the understanding of the effect boundary of mindfulness. This study also helps guide organizations to better design and carry out mindfulness and flow interventions.
Ethics Approval and Informed Consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee.
Data Sharing Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the author, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.
Ethics Statement
The whole research project was completed under the approval and supervision of the Xiamen Guoxin Credit Big Data Innovation Research Institute (Ethics Committee).
The author declares that he has followed the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
The author declares that he has obtained informed consent from the study participants. Only the questionnaires with informed consent forms signed by the subjects are valid in this study.
On the title page of the questionnaire, all participants were told why the research was being conducted, whether or not anonymity was assured, and how the data they were providing were being stored and used. Those who are worried about the use of the data or the purpose of this study could refuse to participate in the study or withdraw from the study at any time to ensure their right to confidentiality.
Disclosure
The author declares no conflicts of interest in this work.