Abstract
Purpose
The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected people’s mental health. The direct and indirect pathways between social support and suicidal ideation in the period are still unclear. This study explores the pathways from social support to suicidal ideation through resilience and depressive symptoms among undergraduates during the COVID-19 campus lockdown.
Methods
During two weeks of the COVID-19 campus lockdown, a total of 12,945 undergraduates at a university in eastern China completed the questionnaire including sociodemographic characteristics, suicidal ideation, social support, resilience, and depressive symptoms. A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to analyze the direct and indirect pathways from social support to suicidal ideation via the mediators of resilience and depressive symptoms.
Results
Of the 12,917 undergraduates included in this study, 7.4% (n = 955) reported they sometimes had suicidal ideation, 0.8% (n = 109) reported they often had suicidal ideation, 0.9% (n = 122) reported they always had suicidal ideation, and 13.2% (n = 1704) reported they had depressive symptoms. Social support exerted significant direct (β = −0.058), indirect (β = −0.225), and total (β = −0.283) effects on suicidal ideation; 20.5% of the total effect was direct, and 79.5% was indirect. Social support predicted suicidal ideation through resilience (β = −0.038), and depressive symptoms (β = −0.087), explaining 13.4%, and 30.7% of the total effect, respectively. Social support predicted suicidal ideation through the sequential mediation of resilience and depressive symptoms (β = −0.099), explaining 35.0% of the total effect.
Conclusion
This is the first study to provide the evidence of pathways from social support to suicidal ideation through resilience and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 campus lockdown among undergraduates in China. Both direct and indirect pathways from social support to suicidal ideation were identified as intervention targets to reduce suicidal ideation.
Abbreviations
AGFI, adjusted goodness-of-fit index; CFA, Confirmatory factor analysis; CFI, comparative fit index; COVID-19, 2019 coronavirus disease; GFI, goodness of fit index; IMV, integrated motivational-volitional; LMICs, low- and middle-income countries; RMSEA, the root–mean–square error of approximation; SEM, structural equation modeling; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; MSPSS, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; PCQ, Psychological Capital Questionnaire; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire; WHO, World Health Organization.
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to original consent, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Xuzhou Medical University Ethics Committee (ID number: XMUs 22/0406). All procedures were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the participants for their contribution.
Disclosure
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this manuscript.