Aldosterone receptor antagonists: current perspectives and therapies

Abstract

Aldosterone is a downstream effector of angiotensin II in the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and binds to the mineralocorticoid receptor. The classical view of aldosterone primarily acting at the level of the kidneys to regulate plasma potassium and intravascular volume status is being supplemented by evidence of new “off-target” effects of aldosterone in other organ systems. The genomic effects of aldosterone are well known, but there is also evidence for non-genomic effects and these recently identified effects of aldosterone have required a revision in the traditional view of aldosterone’s role in human health and disease. The aim of this article is to review the biological action of aldosterone and the mineralocorticoid receptor leading to subsequent physiologic and pathophysiologic effects involving the vasculature, central nervous system, heart, and kidneys. Furthermore, we outline current evidence evaluating the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of primary aldosteronism, primary hypertension, resistant hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease.

Keywords:

• aldosterone antagonist
• mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
• primary aldosteronism
• hypertension
• obstructive sleep apnea
• heart failure
• chronic kidney disease

Aldosterone, the mineralocorticoid receptor, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

The traditional view of aldosterone was that it acted primarily as a regulator of sodium, potassium, and water homeostasis. A new paradigm for aldosterone and its role in human health and disease is quickly emerging, however.¹ Chronic exposure to elevated plasma aldosterone levels result in vascular, cardiac, renal, and metabolic complications that are independent of blood pressure (BP). Numerous cell culture, animal, and human studies have shown how aldosterone and the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) are implicated in activation of a variety of pathologic processes including inflammation, remodeling, and fibrosis in several target organs. This article is an overview of the relevant past and recent findings regarding the interaction between aldosterone, the MR, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in a variety of clinical conditions, including primary aldosteronism (PA), primary hypertension, resistant hypertension (RHTN), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Aldosterone is a steroid hormone and downstream effector of angiotensin II in the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). Aldosterone is mainly synthesized by the adrenal cortex, but is also present in vascular, brain, heart, and adipose tissues leading to local autocrine or paracrine effects. The MR has been identified in epithelial and non-epithelial tissues including the kidney, colon, vasculature, brain, heart, and adipose tissue and binds both mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids with equal affinity. In addition to the well known effect of aldosterone in the kidney, including sodium reabsorption with concomitant potassium and hydrogen ion excretion, the more widespread effects of hyperaldosteronism include sympathetic nervous system activation, increased oxidant stress with inflammation, remodeling, apoptosis, and fibrosis (Figure 1). The biological action of the MR is mediated by the differential expression of proteins resulting from interactions of multiple elaborate transcriptional and translational mechanisms.² Along with the well known genomic effects of aldosterone there is also evidence for non-genomic effects, whereby, rapid actions of aldosterone appear within several minutes in a target tissue.³

Figure 1 Activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor.

Aldosterone antagonists or MRAs have been proven to be beneficial for patients with a variety of clinical conditions including PA, primary and resistant hypertension, HF, and CKD. The three major MRA agents are spironolactone, eplerenone, and canrenone, each with different pharmacological characteristics as outlined in Table 1. Spironolactone is a non-selective, competitive MRA that is structurally similar to progesterone and metabolized in the liver to active metabolites. Additionally, spironolactone also acts as an antagonist to the androgen receptor, a weak antagonist to the glucocorticoid receptor, and agonist to the progesterone receptor. These receptor-mediated actions also result in the associated adverse effects of spironolactone including hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, gynecomastia, impotence, menstrual disturbances, hirsutism, and decreased libido. Canrenone is an active metabolite of spironolactone with a long half-life and is currently only available in Europe. Eplerenone is derived from spironolactone and considered a selective MRA with limited cross-reactivity for the androgen and progesterone receptors thus lacking many of the significant sexually-related adverse effects known to be associated with the use of spironolactone.

Table 1 Pharmacological characteristics of spironolactone, canrenone, and eplerenone^86–90

Characteristics	Spironolactone	Canrenone	Eplerenone
Molecular formula and mass, g/mol	C24H32O4S, 416.6	C22H28O3, 340.5	C24H30O6, 414.5
Mean peak plasma concentration, ng/mL	80a	181a	1720b
Time to peak plasma concentration, hours	2.6a	4.3a	1.5b
Elimination half-life, hours	1.3–2.0 (parent) 13.8–16.5 (metabolites)	18–22	4–6
Metabolism	Hepatic	Active metabolite	Hepatic (CYP3A4)
Excretion	Urine (primarily), feces	Urine, feces	Urine (67%), feces (32%)
Protein binding, %	90	98	50
Administration	Oral	Oral	Oral
Clinical indications	PA, edema (CHF, cirrhosis, or nephrotic syndrome), primary HTN, hypokalemia, and CHF (NYHA class II–IV)		LVEF ≤ 40% after AMI and primary HTN
Contraindications	Anuria, AKI, significant impairment of renal excretory function, or hyperkalemia		Plasma K^+ > 5.5 mEq/L at initiation, CrCl ≤ 30 mL/min, use with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, plasma Cr > 2.0 mg/dL in males and >1.8 mg/dL in females, use of K^+ supplements or K^+-sparing diuretics
Common adverse effects	Diarrhea, gynecomastia, sexual dysfunction, menstrual irregularities, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and hyperuricemia		Hyperkalemia, increased Cr, diarrhea, hyponatremia, vaginal bleeding, and hyperlipidemia
Manufacturer	Generic	Generic	Generic

Notes:

a After administration of 100 mg of spironolactone daily for 15 days, on the 15th day, spironolactone was given immediately after a low-fat breakfast and blood was drawn thereafter;

b after oral administration of eplerenone at a dose of 100 mg as an aqueous solution.

Abbreviations: PA, primary hyperaldosteronism; CHF, congestive heart failure; NYHA, New York Heart Association; HTN, hypertension; AKI, acute kidney injury; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; Cr, creatinine.

Hyperkalemia is probably considered the most concerning adverse effect of MRA therapy with a rate in major clinical trials and in the community ranging from 2%–12%.^4–6 The risk of serious hyperkalemia (K+ ≥ 6.0 mmol/L) is minimized by routine plasma potassium and renal function monitoring and if possible, avoidance of concurrent pharmacotherapies associated with hyperkalemia (eg, potassium supplements, other potassium-sparing diuretics, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs) and vigilant electrolyte surveillance if a patient is taking an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB).^7–9 Understandably, many practitioners caring for patients with renal dysfunction and an indication for MRA therapy may not prescribe a MRA due to the increased risk of developing hyperkalemia. However, patients with CKD demonstrated a low incidence of hyperkalemia when using spironolactone.¹⁰ The importance of MRA therapy in patients with renal dysfunction was shown in a recent analysis from the RALES trial, which showed that although patients with HF and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rates had worse outcomes, they also received the greatest benefit from spironolactone therapy.¹¹ Of particular interest, a novel therapeutic agent called RLY5016 (oral, a non-absorbed, potassium-binding polymer) prevented hyperkalemia in patients with HF receiving standard therapy and spironolactone.¹² New potassium-binding agents, if shown to have long-term effectiveness and improve clinical outcomes, may have a role in safely starting and continuing MRA therapy in patients at high risk for developing hyperkalemia.

Primary aldosteronism

PA most commonly results from adrenal hyperplasia with other causes such as adrenal adenoma or other inherited disorders being less common. Some investigators require elevated plasma aldosterone levels (usually aldosterone > 15 ng/dL) in addition to an elevated aldosterone to renin ratio for a positive screening test for PA, however, it has been reported that plasma aldosterone levels of 9–16 ng/dL have been seen in patients diagnosed with PA by fludrocortisone suppression testing.¹³ The prevalence of PA in the general hypertensive population was evaluated in a study of 609 patients and found to be 6.1% with an average plasma aldosterone level of 9.67 ± 6.93 ng/dL.¹⁴ Interestingly, among those with stage III hypertension (>180/110 mmHg) the prevalence of PA was 13.2% compared with 8% in those with stage II hypertension (160–179/100–109 mmHg) and 2% in those with stage I hypertension (140–159/90–99 mmHg).¹⁴ In PA, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is associated with abnormal myocardial fibrosis leading to significant diastolic dysfunction.^15,16 Compared with primary hypertension, patients with PA are at increased risk of cardiovascular events including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction (MI), HF, stroke, and atrial fibrillation^17–19 further demonstrating the adverse effects of excess aldosterone. It has been shown that in patients with PA, an appropriate surgical procedure or medical treatment with a MRA is associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular events.^18,20,21

Primary hypertension

Plasma aldosterone levels positively correlate with incident^22,23 and resistant^24,25 hypertension and MRA therapy has been utilized in the treatment of primary hypertension for many years.²⁶ The pathology behind the increased plasma aldosterone and primary hypertension is likely due to increased vasoconstriction and endothelial cell dysfunction. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of eplerenone, 417 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomized to eplerenone (50, 100, 400 mg once daily or 25, 50, 200 mg twice daily), spironolactone (50 mg twice daily), or placebo. The mean reductions from baseline to final visit seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were ~15 and ~9 mmHg respectively at the eplerenone 400 mg daily total dosing (400 mg once daily or 200 mg twice daily) which was similar to the spironolactone 50 mg twice daily dosing.²⁷ Seated and 24-hour ambulatory BP was significantly reduced for all doses of eplerenone compared with placebo; the highest doses of eplerenone were comparable to the spironolactone group.²⁷ In another randomized, double-blind trial using eplerenone and losartan in 348 African American and 203 white patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and plasma aldosterone levels between 6.7–7.5 ng/dL, eplerenone was as effective as losartan in reducing SBP and DBP in the high renin patient group, more effective than losartan in the low renin patient group, and more effective than losartan in African American patients.²⁸ In a smaller study of 341 hypertensive patients, eplerenone was evaluated as add-on therapy in patients with inadequately controlled BP on an ACEI or ARB alone and showed that the addition of eplerenone over 8 weeks significantly lowered SBP in both groups and DBP in patients treated with an ARB.²⁹ MRAs have been clearly shown to be effective in lowering BP in a wide-ranging patient population with primary hypertension.

In primary hypertension, activation of the RAAS correlates with LV hypertrophy and poor cardiovascular outcomes that may be attenuated with MRA therapy. In a small study of 11 patients with primary hypertension, spironolactone plus an ACEI (trandolapril) versus an ACEI alone decreased LV mass in correlation with reduction in plasma procollagen type III amino-terminal peptide (PIIINP) levels and suggests that MR blockade limits extracellular collagen turnover.³⁰ The 4-E Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Study (Effects of eplerenone, enalapril, and eplerenone/enalapril in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy) was a 9-month, randomized, double-blind trial comparing LV hypertrophy regression assessed by MRI in 202 patients with hypertension and LV hypertrophy treated with eplerenone 200 mg daily, enalapril 40 mg daily, or eplerenone 200 mg and enalapril 10 mg daily.³¹ This study showed that eplerenone was as effective as enalapril in LV hypertrophy regression and BP control and combination therapy was more effective in reducing LV hypertrophy and SBP than eplerenone alone.³¹ Additionally, a small, randomized, double-blind study of 16 hypertensive patients showed that eplerenone treatment was associated with reduced stiffness, decreased collagen-elastin ratio, and a reduction in circulating inflammatory mediators after 1 year when compared to atenolol.³² Taken together, these studies suggest that in hypertensive patients, MRA therapy not only lowers BP but may also reduce LV hypertrophy and limit end organ damage.

Increased sympathetic nerve activity has been demonstrated in patients with primary hypertension, RHTN, and HF which contributes to the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality observed in these patient populations.³³ Recently, it has been shown that in patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas there is reversible increased sympathetic nerve activity after unilateral adrenalectomy as well as plasma aldosterone and BP declines.³⁴ Due to the hypothesis that increased sympathetic nerve activity may contribute to the morbidity and mortality related to longstanding uncontrolled hypertension, device-based therapies including baroreflex activation therapy and renal denervation are being studied in patients with primary and resistant hypertension. Device-based therapies, although promising and shown to lower sympathetic nerve activity in hypertensive patients, have not yet demonstrated improved long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recently, Raheja et al has shown that spironolactone (25 mg/day) attenuates both chlorthalidone-induced sympathetic activation and insulin resistance in humans that was independent of BP reduction.³⁵ This study by Raheja et al demonstrates that MR antagonism in the central nervous system and decreasing sympathetic activity are important therapeutic targets. These studies provide more evidence for the continued development of new pharmacologic and device-based therapies as sympatholytic agents for hypertension.³⁵

Resistant hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea

The 2008 Scientific statement from the American Heart Association defined RHTN as BP remaining above goal (<140/90 mmHg for the general population and <130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes or renal disease), despite the concurrent use of optimal doses of three antihypertensive agents of different classes, ideally including a diuretic.³⁶ Poor cardiovascular outcomes are believed to be increased in patients with RHTN due to longstanding, severe hypertension complicated by additional risk factors including obesity, diabetes, and renal dysfunction. In a recently published study, among stable hypertensive patients with atherothrombotic disease in the international Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry, the prevalence of RHTN was 12.7% and identified a subgroup with significantly increased rates of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke through 4 years of follow-up (HR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.02–1.20]; P = 0.017).³⁷

Secondary forms of hypertension are common in patients with RHTN, of which PA is the most common and considered to be a significant contributor to treatment resistance. It is generally believed that ~10% of hypertensive patients may have biochemical evidence for PA and are more likely to have RHTN. Among patients with RHTN the prevalence of PA is 17% to 22%^24,38–40 which is considerably higher than hypertensive patients without treatment resistance. A prospective analysis evaluating 279 patients with RHTN, and 53 control patients with normal BP or hypertension controlled with ≤2 antihypertensive medications, showed significantly higher levels of plasma aldosterone (13.0 ± 0.5 versus 8.4 ± 0.7 ng/dL), aldosterone-renin ratio, 24-hour urinary aldosterone, and brain and atrial natriuretic peptide levels, and significantly lower levels of plasma renin activity in patients with RHTN versus control patients.⁴¹ This finding indicates increased intravascular volume in patients with RHTN despite treatment with the recommended doses of thiazide diuretics. Additionally, in a prospective clinical trial by Gaddam et al, 108 patients were evaluated for the effect of spironolactone in RHTN patients with (n = 37) and without (n = 71) hyperaldosteronism.⁴² Spironolactone treatment in both the hyperaldosteronism and normal aldosterone groups was associated with significantly decreased SBP and LV mass at the 3-month follow-up.⁴² In the hyperaldosteronism group there was also significant decrease in left atrial volume, RV and LV end-diastolic volumes, and brain natriuretic peptide.⁴² These studies support the hypothesis that hyperaldosteronism causes intravascular volume overload in patients with RHTN and the benefit of MRA therapy in patients with RHTN appears to be independent of underlying plasma aldosterone levels.

Spironolactone effectively reduces SBP and DBP as add-on therapy to a current antihypertensive regimen in patients with RHTN.^43,44 In a recent open-label prospective study, 175 patients with RHTN received spironolactone in doses of 25 to 100 mg/day and after a median interval of 7 months, the mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP and DBP were reduced by 16 mmHg and 9 mmHg, respectively, reductions that persisted at a median of 15 months follow-up.⁴⁵ Another open-label prospective crossover study comparing spironolactone (25–50 mg/day) added to an ACEI or ARB vs the combination of an ACEI and ARB in 42 patients with RHTN, demonstrated that the addition of spironolactone significantly reduced BP compared with dual blockade of the RAAS alone (24-hour mean BP reduction 21/9 mmHg vs 7/3 mmHg, respectively).⁴⁶ BP control was achieved by 21% of patients on dual blockade and up to 56% on spironolactone with ambulatory BP monitoring.⁴⁶ These studies strongly support the addition of MRA therapy to standard therapy in patients with RHTN not controlled on three medications.

Sleep disordered breathing and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are associated with hypertension⁴⁷ and appear to be especially pronounced in patients with RHTN.⁴⁸ Furthermore, there is a documented association between excess plasma aldosterone levels (16.3 ± 8.1 ng/dL), RHTN, and worsened severity of OSA.^25,49 Gaddam et al tested the hypothesis that aldosterone-mediated chronic fluid retention influences the severity of OSA in patients with RHTN in an open-label study after spironolactone (25–50 mg/day) was added to existing antihypertensive therapy for 8 weeks.⁵⁰ The apnea–hypopnea index (39.8 ± 19.5 vs 22.0 ± 6.8 events/hour; P < 0.05), hypoxic index (13.6 ± 10.8 versus 6.7 ± 6.6 events/hour; P < 0.05), weight, and clinic and ambulatory BPs were significantly reduced, which supports the hypothesis that MRA therapy reduces the severity of OSA in patients with RHTN.⁵⁰ The interesting interplay between hyperaldosteronism, RHTN, and OSA remains an area of ongoing study and the increased plasma aldosterone in RHTN and OSA is the likely culprit of increased fluid retention and vascular resistance.

Heart failure

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or systolic HF

In patients with HF, plasma aldosterone may reach levels (~300 ng/dL) many fold higher than those measured in normal subjects (5–15 ng/dL).⁵¹ Nearly a third of patients with LV systolic dysfunction have elevated plasma aldosterone levels above the upper limit of normal (.15.0 ng/dL) despite evidence of ACE inhibition.^52,53 Aldosterone production eludes the effects of ACEIs and ARBs after chronic treatment in patients with HF, returning to or above initial baseline in a phenomenon termed aldosterone “escape” or “breakthrough.”⁵² This phenomenon may explain the beneficial effects of MRA therapy when added to an ACEI or ARB in patients with HF.

The Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) published in 1999 was the first large randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a MRA on survival in 1663 patients (822 to spironolactone and 841 to placebo) with current New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV symptoms or history of NYHA class IV symptoms due to LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction (EF) ≤35%) on optimal medical therapy.⁵⁴ Patients were randomized to spironolactone (25–50 mg/day, mean daily study dose was 26 mg) for a mean follow-up of 24 months.⁵⁴ Notably, the trial was terminated early due to a significant mortality benefit in the spironolactone group. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and was 35% in the spironolactone group vs 46% in the placebo group (RR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60–0.82]; P < 0.001) with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 9 over 24 months of therapy.⁵⁴ Secondary end points included death from cardiac causes, hospitalization for cardiac causes, the combined incidence of death from cardiac causes or hospitalization for cardiac causes, and a change in the NYHA class which were also reduced or improved in the spironolactone group.⁵⁴ In addition to being the first trial to show a mortality benefit with spironolactone in patients with HF, additional insights from RALES suggest that spironolactone limited the excessive extracellular matrix turnover in the heart which may contribute to prevention of adverse cardiac remodeling in patients with HF.⁵⁵

The Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial published in 2003 evaluating the effect of eplerenone in 6642 patients (3313 to eplerenone and 3319 to placebo) with LV dysfunction (LVEF < 40%) after acute MI.⁵⁶ Eplerenone was administered at 25–50 mg/day (mean final daily study dose was 43 mg) between 3 and 14 days after acute MI with a mean follow-up of 16 months.⁵⁶ The two primary end points were time to death from any cause and time to death from cardiovascular causes or first hospitalization for a cardiovascular event. All-cause mortality was 14.4% in the eplerenone group vs 16.7% in the placebo group (RR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.75–0.96]; P = 0.008) with an NNT of 43 over 16 months of therapy.⁵⁶ Death from cardiovascular causes or first hospitalization for a cardiovascular event was 26.7% in the eplerenone group versus 30.0% in the placebo group (RR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.79–0.95]; P = 0.002) with an NNT of 30, over 16 months of therapy.⁵⁶ The major secondary end points were death from cardiovascular causes and death from any cause or any hospitalization which were also reduced in the eplerenone group.⁵⁶ In a similar study evaluating MRA therapy on post-infarction LV remodeling, Hayashi et al evaluated spironolactone and ACEI (n = 65) or ACEI alone (n = 69) in 134 patients with first acute anterior MI after revascularization and found that spironolactone and ACEI prevented post-infarction LV remodeling better than ACEI alone.⁵⁷ In both RALES and EPHESUS the plasma aldosterone levels were normal, suggesting that MR activation occurs by ligands other than aldosterone, thus providing strong evidence for the therapeutic effectiveness of MRA therapy despite normal aldosterone levels in patients with HF.

The Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization And Survival Study in Heart Failure (EMPHASIS-HF) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial published in 2011 evaluating eplerenone in patients with LV dysfunction and NYHA class II symptoms on optimal medical therapy.⁵⁸ Eplerenone was used at a dose of 25–50 mg/day (mean daily study dose was 39.1 mg at 5 months) in addition to standard therapy.⁵⁸ The trial enrolled 2737 patients with NYHA class II symptoms and LVEF ≤ 30% (patients with LVEF > 30% but, 35% could be included if QRS complex was >130 msec on ECG).⁵⁸ The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or a first hospitalization for HF and was 18.3% in the eplerenone group and 25.9% in the placebo group (HR: 0.63 [95% CI: 0.54–0.74]; P < 0.001).⁵⁸ The trial was terminated early due to the benefit of eplerenone with a median follow-up of 21 months. Post hoc analyses of the EMPHASIS-HF trial have suggested that patients with mild HF and treated with eplerenone had significantly fewer HF hospitalizations especially within the first year.⁵⁹

Canrenone has been shown to improve diastolic function in patients with primary hypertension independent of effects on BP and LV mass regression suggesting a direct myocardial effect.⁶⁰ There are less clinical data on canrenone than for other MRAs, but recently, the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled AREA IN-CHF (Anti-remodeling Effect of Canrenone in Patients with Mild Chronic Heart Failure) trial evaluated LV remodeling and the composite endpoint of cardiac death and hospitalization using canrenone on top of optimal medical treatment (25 mg/day titrated up to 50 mg/day, mean dose was 43.8 mg/day) for 12 months in patients with NYHA class II HF.⁶¹ The trial showed a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of cardiac death and hospitalization in the canrenone vs placebo group (7.9% vs 15.1%, P = 0.02) with a mild improvement of LVEF in the canrenone group.⁶¹

An ongoing multicenter, randomized, open-labeled study called the Aldosterone Blockade Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction (ALBATROSS, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01059136) trial is designed to evaluate MR blockade early after acute MI in addition to standard therapy.⁶² This study will assess the effectiveness of aldosterone blockade by a 200 mg intravenous bolus of potassium canrenoate followed by a daily 25 mg dose of spironolactone for 6 months, on top of standard therapy compared with standard therapy alone among 1600 patients admitted for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) or high-risk (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] Score ≥ 3) non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) within 72 hours after symptom onset.⁶² The primary outcome is 6-month rate of the composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia, indication for implantable cardioversion device, and occurrence or aggravation of HF.⁶² This study is expected to reach completion in February 2013. The results of this study are heavily anticipated as will be shown, in contrast to previous studies studying the chronic effects of MRAs, the acute effect of MRA therapy after a STEMI or high-risk NSTEMI.

These clinical trials confirm the involvement of MR activation in systolic HF, independent of changes in plasma aldosterone and potassium levels, indicating that the beneficial effects of MRAs go beyond their diuretic or potassium-sparing properties.⁶³ Currently available evidence supports the overall view that MRA therapy is cardioprotective in patients with systolic HF. Unfortunately, despite the well documented benefits of MRAs in systolic HF, clinical use remains far below expectations and they are grossly underused in community practices despite detailed guidelines about proper patient selection.^64–66 Studies suggest that of the patients who are eligible for MRA therapy only 33%–36% receive therapy.^6,67 Enhanced practitioner education and focused, performance-improvement interventions may be effective measures to expand the use of MRAs, although initiation of MRA therapy should be done carefully and selectively in appropriate patients.⁶⁸

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or diastolic HF

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an increasing public health concern. HFpEF is the clinical syndrome of HF, but with preserved systolic function and abnormalities in diastolic function involving LV relaxation and stiffness. Myocardial fibrosis is a key pathological feature of HFpEF and is a major determinant of myocardial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction. Aldosterone is a potent stimulator of myocardial and vascular fibrosis, thus activation of the MR may be a key mediator in the pathologic progression of HFpEF and an important therapeutic target. Inappropriate activation of the RAAS has been shown to lead to the development of HFpEF via different mechanisms, including increased oxidative stress, inflammation, hypertrophy, and fibrosis.⁶⁹ By reducing cardiac fibrosis and improving function, MRA therapy has the potential to be beneficial in HFpEF.

In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of 30 hypertensive patients with HFpEF, spironolactone therapy (25 mg/day) over 6 months improved LV relaxation and filling patterns independent of changes in BP when compared with placebo.⁷⁰ More recent studies provide additional evidence suggesting a possible benefit of MRA therapy in the management of patients with HFpEF. Mak et al and Edwards et al demonstrated that MRA therapy prevented a progressive increase in markers of collagen turnover and improved diastolic function in patients with HFpEF^71,72 A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 44 patients with HFpEF evaluated eplerenone treatment using a primary end point of 6-minute walk distance and secondary end points of diastolic function and biomarkers of collagen turnover.⁷³ At 6 months there were similar improvements in 6-minute walk distance between the eplerenone and placebo groups, although eplerenone was associated with a significant reduction in plasma markers of collagen turnover and improvement in echocardiographic measures of diastolic function.⁷³ Most recently, the Aldosterone Receptor Blockade in Diastolic Heart Failure (Aldo-DHF) trial was designed to test the hypothesis that MR antagonism with spironolactone would improve diastolic function and maximal exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF⁷⁴ The Aldo-DHF trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 422 patients with chronic NYHA class II or III symptoms, preserved LVEF of ≥50%, and echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction, who were randomly assigned to spironolactone 25 mg once daily (n = 213) or placebo (n = 209).⁷⁴ Co-primary endpoints were changes in diastolic function (E/e′) on echocardiography and maximal exercise capacity (peak VO2) on cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 12 months. MR antagonism improved diastolic function (E/e′ decreased from 12.7 [±3.6] to 12.1 [±3.7] with spironolactone and increased from 12.8 [±4.4] to 13.6 [±4.3] with placebo [adjusted mean difference, −1.5; 95% CI, −2.0 to −0.9; P < 0.001]) but did not affect maximal exercise capacity, patient symptoms, or validated measures of quality of life.⁷⁴ The Aldo-DHF trial showed that MRAs may improve diastolic function by echocardiography, but did not show any improvement in the measured clinical factors. Additional studies are needed to assess whether bettering diastolic function improves clinical endpoints. Still to be completed is the Trial of Aldosterone Antagonist Therapy in Adults with Preserved Ejection Fraction Congestive Heart Failure (TOPCAT, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094302), which is an ongoing randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of spironolactone (15–45 mg/day or placebo) in up to 3515 HFpEF patients with targeted mean follow-up of 3.75 years and minimum follow-up of 15 months for the final randomized patient.⁷⁵ The primary end point is the composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for HF, or aborted cardiac arrest with secondary end points including quality of life, nonfatal cardiovascular events, and new-onset atrial fibrillation.⁷⁵ This large, randomized controlled trial is expected to reach completion in April 2013 and could potentially demonstrate MRA therapy as an important evidence-based therapeutic for improving morbidity and mortality in patients with HFpEF.

Chronic kidney disease

PA is associated with renal injury and the development of CKD.⁷⁶ The major therapeutic intervention to delay the progression of CKD involves the use of ACEIs, ARBs and, recently, direct renin inhibitors. However, even at full doses, ACEIs and/or ARBs decrease but do not prevent the progression of CKD. MRA therapy is an emerging strategy for delaying the progression of CKD through additional inhibition of the RAAS.^77,78 MRA therapy has been shown to be highly effective in reducing renal injury and albuminuria and several clinical studies have assessed the effects of an add-on MRA to ACEI and/or ARB in patients with CKD. In a unique study involving 269 older patients (≥50 years of age) with hypertension and widened pulse pressure, eplerenone and amlodipine had similar SBP and pulse pressure lowering effects, but eplerenone reduced microalbuminuria to a greater extent than amlodipine.⁷⁹ A multicenter, randomized, open-labeled trial examined the effectiveness of RAAS blockade via three different mechanisms (“triple blockade”) by adding an MRA to the treatment of patients who did not respond adequately to the dual blockade with an ACEI and ARB.⁸⁰ In this study, 32 patients with proteinuria (>0.5 g/day) were enrolled after more than 12 weeks of ACEI (enalapril 5 mg/day) and ARB (losartan 50 mg/day) combination treatment, after which, the patients were given either triple blockade with spironolactone (25 mg/day) or control (trichlormethiazide 1 mg or furosemide 20 mg) and after 1 year the urinary protein level decreased by 58% (P < 0.05) with the triple blockade but was unchanged in the controls.⁸⁰ In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis including 11 trials (991 patients) of patients with CKD, it was found that adding an MRA to an ACEI and/or ARB significantly reduced proteinuria more than therapy with a single agent alone.⁸¹ Most recently, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 21 patients with type 1 diabetes and persistent microalbuminuria used spironolactone (25 mg/day) or placebo for 60 days in addition to standard therapy and showed that spironolactone decreased the primary endpoint of urinary albumin excretion from 90 mg/day to 35 mg/day (P = 0.01), and the improvement was independent of BP⁸² The results of these recent clinical trials show that low dose MRA therapy has the potential to become part of standard therapy for patients with CKD, although clinical trials assessing harder clinical end points are required.

MRA therapy has been limited by widespread concern about hyperkalemia, even though it has been recently shown that spironolactone administration in mild to moderate CKD patients resulted in a < 1 % incidence of serious hyperkalemia (K⁺ ≥ 6.0 mmol/L).⁸³ In a recent review, Shavit et al demonstrate that the increased risk of hyperkalemia in MRA treated patients has been exaggerated and the risk for developing hyperkalemia in both CKD and end-stage renal disease patients is significantly less than previously thought.⁸⁴ Like with all treatment plans, the risk-benefit ratio should be considered along with careful laboratory monitoring for all patients with renal disease on MRA therapy.

Conclusion

Aldosterone is a complex steroid hormone with widespread physiologic effects. Chronically elevated levels of aldosterone are more common than traditionally thought, and contribute significantly to a variety of disease processes. The pathologic role of excess aldosterone is supported by a growing body of literature demonstrating therapeutic benefit of MR blockade in multiple conditions including primary hypertension, RHTN, congestive HF, and CKD. Hyperaldosteronism also appears to play a role in OSA and the relationship between these two important conditions remains an area of ongoing study. Third-and fourth-generation MRAs are in preclinical development and may offer novel alternatives with better tissue selectivity than currently approved therapies.⁸⁵ Further advances in our understanding of aldosterone and the role of MRAs in associated conditions will serve to continue to improve clinical outcomes.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in this work.