207
Views
133
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Morphological and molecular characterization of selected desert soil cyanobacteria: three species new to science including Mojavia pulchra gen. et sp. Nov.

, , , &
Pages 481-502 | Received 26 Oct 2006, Accepted 22 Mar 2007, Published online: 22 Apr 2019
 

Abstract

K. Řeháková, J.R. Johansen, D.A. Casamatta, L. Xuesong and J. Vincent. 2007. Morphological and molecular characterization of selected desert soil cyanobacteria: three species new to science including Mojavia pulchra gen. et sp.nov. Phycologia 46: 481–502. DOI: 10.2216/06-92.1

Four Nostocacean species from desert soils of the western United States, including the phycobiont of the lichen Collema tenax, were studied. Our strains could be forced into morphospecies previously described from Europe, but phylogenetic analysis indicated that they belonged in separate, distinct, and previously undescribed taxa. Partial 16S rRNA sequences of the strains CM1-VF10, CM1-VF14, CNP-AK1 and JT2-VF2 were determined and aligned with published Nostoc sequences from GenBank and our lab, as well as other Nostocales. All aligned sequences were analysed using parsimony, distance, and maximum likelihood methods, and trees based on three separate data sets were generated. Full 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions were also characterized for our strains, and secondary structures of the ITS region were compared among these and N. commune and N. punctiforme. Intragenomic variability was documented among ITS regions in different operons for these taxa. One of the four strains (JT2-VF2) is distinct from Nostoc by both morphological and molecular criteria and is described as Mojavia pulchra gen. et sp. nov. Two other strains (CM1-VF10 and CM1-VF14) are described as Nostoc indistinguendum sp. nov. and Nostoc desertorum sp. nov., respectively. According to both morphological and molecular characteristics, the phycobiont of C. tenax is not N. commune, N. sphaericum or N. punctiforme as variously suggested in the lichenological literature, and the older name for this taxon, Nostoc lichenoides, is consequently validated in this paper.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work would have been impossible without the help and support of many Czech and American people and institutions. We would like to thank Prof. Jiří Komárek for the Latin descriptions of new taxa and helpful discussions. We also appreciate the support and help of Anessa J. Kennedy, Valerie Flechtner, Sarah Boyer, Larry St. Clair, Pavel Hrouzek, and Tomáš Hauer. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful criticism of earlier versions of this manuscript. Initial collections were funded by DEB-9870201, United States National Science Foundation, with continuing support from DEB-0206360. Support in the Czech Republic was provided by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (No 206/03/P024).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.