588
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Priority Paper Evaluation

Systolic Heart Failure: Should we Care About Electrical, Mechanical or Electromechanical Dyssynchrony?

Pages 151-153 | Published online: 15 Mar 2010
 

Abstract

Evaluation of: Cho GY, Kim HK, Kim YJ et al.: Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony for prediction of cardiac events in patients with systolic heart failure. Heart (2009) (Epub ahead of print). Prolonged QRS duration is electrocardiographic evidence of electrical dyssynchrony and is associated with a higher incidence of cardiac events and mortality. The study by Cho et al. (167 patients were followed up for 33.4 ± 19.9 months) shows that mechanical dyssynchrony has an additional value over QRS duration in predicting cardiac events in patients with systolic heart failure. The dyssynchrony was assessed through tissue Doppler imaging – a temporal difference between the septal to lateral wall (Ts-1) of 65 ms or more defined the mechanical dyssynchrony. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, both QRS duration (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.85; p = 0.032) and Ts-1 (HR: 2.35; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of cardiac events. Those with both electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony had a HR of 3.98 (95% CI: 2.02–7.86; p < 0.001) when compared with those with a normal QRS duration and absence of mechanical dyssynchrony. Combining the information provided by QRS duration with mechanical dyssynchrony through Ts-1 is clinically relevant to stratifying the risk of hospitalization or death in systolic heart failure patients. However, these data do not support the use of mechanical dyssynchrony to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy, nor to predict response to this therapy. This was not assessed by the study.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.