325
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Cabazitaxel Schedules in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Review

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 91-102 | Received 30 Jun 2020, Accepted 19 Aug 2020, Published online: 02 Dec 2020
 

Abstract

Cabazitaxel (25mg/m2 every 3 weeks) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel. It is associated with a risk of neutropenic complications, which may be a barrier to its use in daily clinical practice, particularly in frail elderly patients. Here the authors reviewed key studies conducted with cabazitaxel (TROPIC, PROSELICA, AFFINITY, CARD and the European compassionate use program) and pilot studies with adapted schedules. Based on this review, the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor from cycle 1 appears crucial to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Preliminary data with alternative schedules look promising, especially for frail patients. Results of the ongoing Phase III CABASTY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02961257) are awaited.

Lay abstract

Cabazitaxel is a type of chemotherapy used to treated patients with advanced prostate cancer. Its toxicity to white blood cells could lead to infectious complications, particularly in frail elderly patients. In this article, the authors reviewed important clinical trials regarding cabazitaxel and adapted schedules. Based on this review, white blood cell–stimulating agents appear crucial to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of cabazitaxel in advanced prostate cancer. Alternative schedules look promising, especially for frail patients. Results of the ongoing Phase III CABASTY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02961257) are awaited.

Author contributions

All authors participated in the writing of the article.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents, received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.