166
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-Analysis

Additional Adjuvant Capecitabine in Early Breast Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 4993-5002 | Received 06 Nov 2020, Accepted 26 Aug 2021, Published online: 25 Oct 2021
 

Abstract

Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant capecitabine in early breast cancer patients. Methods: A literature search of databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer patients. Results: Six studies were eligible and included a total of 6941 patients. Disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.71–0.88; p < 0.0001) was significantly improved with additional capecitabine, whereas improvement in overall survival (OS) was not significant. The more pronounced benefits in both disease-free survival and OS were observed among triple-negative breast cancer patients. Conclusion: Additional capecitabine in the adjuvant setting conferred substantial disease-free survival benefit and a tendency toward improved OS. Triple-negative breast cancer patients can benefit from capecitabine irrespective of the administration sequence. Capecitabine may be considered a preferred additional treatment for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients, and sequential capecitabine can serve as an alternative choice for patients with poor tolerance.

Lay abstract

The authors’ meta-analysis focused on the adjuvant role of capecitabine in early-stage breast cancer patients. The authors combined data from different studies to show that disease-free survival was significantly improved with additional capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy. The more pronounced survival benefits were observed among triple-negative breast cancer patients irrespective of the administration sequence (concurrent/sequential). Capecitabine may be considered a preferred additional treatment for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients, and sequential capecitabine can serve as an alternative choice for patients with poor tolerance.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030313563), Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (cstc2018jxjl130036) and Science and Technology Commission of Chongqing Shapingba District (Jcd201963). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030313563), Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (cstc2018jxjl130036) and Science and Technology Commission of Chongqing Shapingba District (Jcd201963). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.