123
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-Analysis

From part to whole, operative link on to endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia, pathology to endoscopy: gastric intestinal metaplasia graded by endoscopy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2445-2454 | Received 27 Oct 2021, Accepted 21 Apr 2022, Published online: 16 May 2022
 

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prediction of severity of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) in localized and entire gastric mucosa using endoscopy. Methods: The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and performed systematic searches on endoscopic grading of GIM of the entire stomach using Meta-DiSc and Stata. Results: Sensitivity and specificity for the stratified prediction of overall GIM were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85–0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88–0.93), respectively. Sensitivity in predicting the different grades of GIM was higher in operative link on GIM assessment grades 0, III and IV but lower in grades I and II. Conclusion: Digital chromoendoscopy is well suited to predicting the severity of localized and overall GIM.

Author contributions

Conception and design: N Wei and R Shi. Collection and assembly of data: N Wei, M Zhou, S Lei and L Yang. Data analysis and interpretation: M Zhou, S Lei and Z Duan. Manuscript writing: N Wei, L Yang, Z Duan, Y Zhang, Z Zhong and Y Liu. Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This study was supported by Jiangsu Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission, ‘Strong Sanitation Project’: Esophageal Innovation Team. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by Jiangsu Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission, ‘Strong Sanitation Project’: Esophageal Innovation Team. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.