Investigation on Mechanisms of Glycopeptide Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Across The Blood–Brain Barrier

Abstract

Aim: Nanoneuroscience, based on the use polymeric nanoparticles (NPs), represents an emerging field of research for achieving an effective therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. In particular, poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) glyco-heptapetide-conjugated NPs (g7-NPs) were shown to be able to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). However, the in vivo mechanisms of the BBB crossing of this kind of NP has not been investigated until now. This article aimed to develop a deep understanding of the mechanism of BBB crossing of the modified NPs. Materials & methods: Loperamide and rhodamine-123 (model drugs unable to cross the BBB) were loaded into NPs, composed of a mixture of PLGA, differently modified with g7 or with a random sequence of the same aminoamids (random-g7). To study brain targeting of these model drugs, loaded NPs were administered via the tail vein in rats in order to perform both pharmacological studies and biodistribution analysis along with fluorescent, confocal and electron microscopy analysis, in order to achieve the NP BBB crossing mechanism. Computational analysis on the conformation of the g7- and random-g7-NPs of the NP surface was also developed. Results: Only loperamide delivered to the brain with g7-NPs created a high central analgesia, corresponding to the 14% of the injected dose, and data were confirmed by biodistribution studies. Electron photomicrographs showed the ability of g7-NPs in crossing the BBB as evidenced by several endocytotic vesicles and macropinocytotic processes. The computational analysis on g7 and random-g7 showed a different conformation (linear vs globular), thus suggesting a different interaction with the BBB. Conclusion: Taken together, this evidence suggested that g7-NP BBB crossing is enabled by multiple pathways, mainly membrane–membrane interaction and macropinocytosis-like mechanisms. The results of the computational analysis showed the Biousian structure of the g7 peptide, in contrast to random-g7 peptide (globular conformation), suggesting that this difference is pivotal in explaining the BBB crossing and allowing us to hypothesize regarding the mechanism of BBB crossing by g7-NPs.

Keywords::

• BBB crossing
• biodistribution
• nanotechnology
• neuroscience
• pharmacology

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Luca Fabiani (Department of Anatomy and Legal Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy) for technical support in cryotome and microtome cut, and Luca Costantino (Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy) for the synthesis of polymers.

Additional information

Funding

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.