Abstract
Aim: To optimize warfarin dose in patients at risk for thrombotic events, we have recently developed a pharmacogenomic algorithm, which explained 44.9% of the variability in warfarin dose requirements using age, gender, BMI, vitamin K intake, CYP2C9 (*2 and *3) and VKORC1 (*3, *4 and -1639 G>A) as predictors. The aim of the current study is to develop an expanded genetic model that can explain greater percentage of warfarin variability and that has clinical validity. Patients & methods:CYP2C9*8, CYP4F2 V433M, GGCX G8016A and thyroid status were added to an expanded genetic model (n = 243). Results: The expanded genetic model explained 61% of the variability in warfarin dose requirements, has a prediction accuracy of ±11 mg/week and can differentiate warfarin sensitive and warfarin resistant groups efficiently (areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: 0.93 and 0.998, respectively; p < 0.0001). Higher percentage of International Normalized Ratios in therapeutic range (52.68 ± 4.21 vs 43.80 ± 2.27; p = 0.04) and prolonged time in therapeutic range (61.74 ± 3.18 vs 47.75 ± 5.77; p = 0.03) were observed in subjects with a prediction accuracy of <1 mg/day compared with subjects with prediction accuracy >1 mg/day. In the warfarin-resistant group, primary hypothyroidism was found to induce more resistance while in the warfarin-sensitive group, hyperthyroidism was found to increase sensitivity. Conclusion: The expanded genetic model explains greater variability in warfarin dose requirements and it prolongs time in therapeutic range and minimizes out-of-range International Normalized Ratios. Thyroid status also influences warfarin dose adjustments.
Original submitted 21 March 2012; Revision submitted 16 April 2012
Financial & competing interests disclosure
We thank Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India (D.O.NO:SR/SO/HS/0020/2010) for funding this project. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Ethical conduct of research
The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.