87
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Clinical Course of Patients With Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: Can we Predict the Prognosis?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 449-457 | Published online: 13 Mar 2014
 

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to identify prognostic factors of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease by comparing clinical and genetic data with the clinical course. Patients & methods: Patients were classified into two groups according to their response to inhalation rechallenge with lysine-aspirin after at least 1 year of regular treatment with antiasthmatic medications. Results: Forty eight patients (39.3%, group I) had negative responses, whereas 74 patients (60.7%, group II) had positive responses (n = 23) or were not rechallenged owing to persistent symptoms (n = 51). FEV1 at diagnosis and follow-up were significantly lower in group II than in group I. The CCR3 polymorphism at -520T/G differed significantly between the two groups, whereas no difference was found in other SNPs. Conclusion: Baseline FEV1 and lower lung function after treatment were clinical factors indicating a poor prognosis of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. The G allele of CCR3 -520T>G was associated with persistent bronchial hypersensitivity to aspirin.

Original submitted 17 June 2013; Revision 3 January 2014

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: www.textcheck.com/certificate/Hbn99l. This study was approved by a grant of the Korean Health 21 R&D project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A111218-PG01). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

Additional information

Funding

The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: www.textcheck.com/certificate/Hbn99l. This study was approved by a grant of the Korean Health 21 R&D project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A111218-PG01). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.