https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4928-4051
![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
Aim: To assess the effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) and related variables on surgical site infection (SSI) risk in neuromodulation. Methods: This retrospective study followed patients who underwent neuromodulation procedures for at least 9 months to identify postoperative infections. Demographics, clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared. Results: Of 195 cases included, 5 (2.6%) resulted in SSIs. Median HbA1c was significantly higher for the cases with SSIs (8.2 vs 5.6%; p = 0.0044). The rate of SSI was significantly higher among patients with DM (17.9 vs 0%; p = 0.0005), HbA1c≥7% (37.5 vs 0%; p = 0.0009), and perioperative glucose ≥200 mg/dl (40 vs 2.3%; p = 0.0101). Conclusion: DM, elevated HbA1c and perioperative hyperglycemia may all contribute to increased risk of SSIs with neuromodulation procedures.
Plain language summary
Infections are feared complications of surgery. It is important to identify factors that increase the risk of infection to prevent these complications. This study looked at the effects of diabetes and high blood sugar on the risk of infection associated with pain procedures. The researchers followed patients who had these procedures and looked for any infections that occurred afterward. They found that patients with diabetes and high blood sugar levels before surgery were more likely to develop infections after these procedures. More research can help establish blood sugar targets so that physicians can better manage this risk for their patients.
Author contributions
BK Huh, A Huh, S Javed and E Ege were involved in study conception. S Javed, E Ege and D Briggi contributed to data collection and analysis. All authors contributed to the drafting and final approval of the manuscript.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Ethical conduct of research
The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval for all human or animal experimental investigations. As this was a retrospective study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the institutional review board.