91
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Chronic Pain Management by Ethnically and Racially Diverse Older Adults: Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Pain Therapies

, &
Pages 435-454 | Published online: 07 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

SUMMARY Aims: Exploration of racial and ethnic group differences in noncancer chronic pain management in older adults. Participants & methods: Qualitative data, which were collected in semistructured face-to-face interviews with 44 racially and ethnically diverse community-dwelling older adults (ten African–Americans, ten Hispanics, 12 Afro–Caribbeans and 12 non-Hispanic whites), were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. Results: The three racial and ethnic minority groups were more likely to use culturally based treatments (e.g., herbal tea and avocado leaves), home remedies and folk medicine, and/or psychological therapies (e.g., distraction and relaxation) than non-Hispanic whites to manage chronic pain. African–Americans relied on religious coping methods. Non-Hispanic whites were more likely to use physical interventions such as massage and chiropractic treatment. Conclusion: Study findings suggest differences by ethnicity in preferred pain interventions for an older adult population.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Joseph Ouslander of the College of Medicine and Ruth Tappen of the College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, for helping the corresponding author to gain access to the Healthy Aging Research Initiative (HARI) registry and for providing support and guidance in completing the project.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This project was funded by the John A Hartford Foundation, Hartford Geriatric Social Work Faculty Scholars Program. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

Additional information

Funding

This project was funded by the John A Hartford Foundation, Hartford Geriatric Social Work Faculty Scholars Program. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.