Synopsis
Recent literature on conversion reactions is reviewed. Four different perspectives emerged—the neurological, psychoanalytic and sociological standpoints and the view that malingering was responsible for so-called conversion reactions. A questionnaire survey of the opinions of Melbourne psychiatrists on this issue is reported. No concensus of opinion was evident on most points. The association between the psychiatrist's background and his pattern of responses is explored. Experience overseas in Britain or America was associated with particular patterns of response. This suggests that international differences in outlook retard understanding in this area. Research approaches aimed at clarifying the subject are discussed.