22
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A comparison of the Eating Disorder Examination and a general psychiatric schedule

, , &
Pages 852-857 | Received 23 Apr 1997, Accepted 08 Aug 1997, Published online: 11 May 2010
 

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the adequacy of a general interview schedule for the purpose of assessing bulimia net vosa.

Method: In two waves of data collection 18–24 months apart, 250 women were assessed for disordered eating. The first interview was typical of that included in many psychiatric interview schedules and was used to screen women for selection in a subsequent interview. This latter interview, using the Eating Disorder Examination, represents the ‘gold standard’ for the assessment of disordered eating.

Results: While the psychiatric interview satisfactorily assessed disturbed eating in general, it seemed less capable of accurately assessing cases of bulimia nervosa in particular, the major weakness being the overestimation of binge-eating.

Conclusions: Structured psychiatric interviews are suitable for screening purposes to identify women with disordered eating, but identification of bulimia nervosa requires further assessment with a suitable instrument.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.