Abstract
A left field superiority is typically reported for processing a variety of simple and complex nonverbal and patterned visual stimuli, including pictures, though stimulus clarity, degradation and exposure duration may be a significant determinant. Clinical studies indicate deficits in the ability to recognize incomplete figures with right hemisphere damage. However when normal subjects attempted to recognize 80 series of progressively-less-incomplete common objects (each series graded in 10 steps) presented for prolonged inspection to one or other visual field via a display driven by an infrared eyemovement transducer, either field (hemisphere) proved to be equally competent. We review evidence to suggest that such “ecologically-more-valid” techniques may not in fact be intrinsically able to tap minor hemisphere function.