22
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The Topography of 4 Subtraction Erp-Waveforms Derived from a 3-Tone Auditory Oddball Task in Healthy Young Adults

, &
Pages 265-281 | Received 08 Nov 1994, Published online: 07 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Five components were studied in 4 subtraction waveforms derived from ERPs obtained in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone oddball task (common = 70%, C, 0.8 KHz; deviant = 15%, D, 2 KHz; 1.4 KHz = 15%, t. also used as a target (T)). These waveforms reflect different stimulus-mismatch processes and thus their topography could be revealing of different brain regions mediating them. The following mismatches were studied: stimulus-mismatch (deviant-common, D/C, rarity and pitch confounded), pitch-mismatch (T - deviant. T/D, rarity not target features controlled), attention-mismatch (T -t), T/t, controlled for pitch and rarity to show the influence of target features). These are compared with Goodin's procedure [G-wv, (T - common (active)) - (t - common (passive))]. There were main site effects in normalized data in all cases (not P2 and N2 latency). There were separate frontal and posterior contributions to P1, with the former emphasized where target comparisons were involved. Frontal N1 peaks, largest in D/C, spread posterior and to the right where target matching was involved. P2 posterior maxima were also less localized where target features were involved in the comparison. N2 topography was similar between waveforms but spread slightly more to each side in the T/t comparison. Onset was earlier in the D/C comparison. Parietal P3 peaks in waves based on target-ERPs showed a left temporal shift (vs D/C). though in T/D P3 was in fact maximal on the right. Thus an attentional effect is evident as early as 60 ms. Target features modify the anteroposterior distribution of positivity and negativity for the early components and in the lateral-ization of P3-like positivity. A comparison or waveforms by latency of potential shift (running t-test) vs peak identification (M ANOVA) is illustrated and discussed. D/C and T/t (rather than T/D or G-wv) waveforms are recommended for distinguishing comparator mechanisms for stimulus- and task-relevant features.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.