0
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Problems with the Laboratory Identification and Evaluation of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

, &
Pages 148-152 | Accepted 13 Aug 1985, Published online: 06 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

During a 105 day period in mid 1984, 796 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci were recovered from routine specimens handled in the Microbiology Laboratory, Dunedin Hospital. Of these isolates 504 (63.3%) were from wounds, 170 (21.4%) from urines, 58 (7.3%) from intravascular catheter tips, 44 (5.5%) from blood cultures and 20 (2.5%) from sputa. Presumptive identification of 315 consecutive isolates revealed 175 (55.6% of total) strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis, 44 (14.0%) S. capitis, 36 (11.4%) S. haemolyticus/hominis, 29 (9.2%) S. warneri, 19 (6.0%) S. simulans and 12 (3.8%) members of the S. saprophyticus group.

Using laboratory generated criteria, 44.8%, 25.9% and 4.5% of coagulase-negative isolates from catheter tips, urines and blood cultures respectively, were deemed pathologically potentially significant. Although more common, S. epidermidis did not appear to be significantly more virulent than other members of the epidermidis species group or S. simulans; 67% of the S. saprophyticus group isolates from urine were considered pathologically significant.

Antibiograms on the 796 coagulase-negative isolates revealed 63.2% resistant to penicillin, 22.6% to methicillin, 34.8% to cephradine, 27.5% to gentamicin, and 14.4% to erythromycin; multiple resistance was common. Methicillin resistance was a feature of S. saprophyticus group strains. With isolates from catheter tips and blood cultures, a significantly higher percentage of those regarded as significant were gentamicin resistant. Apart from penicillin, antibiotic resistance was not so marked in strains of coagulase-positive staphylococci recovered over the same period.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.