563
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of plasma metanephrines measured by a commercial immunoassay and urinary catecholamines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma

, &
Pages 695-700 | Received 03 Apr 2011, Accepted 11 Aug 2011, Published online: 24 Oct 2011
 

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of pheochromocytomas requires consideration among patients suffering from hypertension, unexplained spells, incidental adrenal masses, or a family history of pheochromocytoma. Accordingly, the diagnosis requires a biochemical test with high sensitivity and specificity. Aim: To compare plasma free metanephrines as measured by a commercial immunoassay and the 24-hour urinary excretion of catecholamines. Method: Plasma free metanephrines were measured in 185 patients suspected of pheochromocytoma. Concomitant measurements of urinary catecholamines were performed in 115 patients. Based on clinical findings, imaging and biochemistry 11 cases were found; 9 were diagnosed with pheochromocytoma, one patient with paraganglioma and one patient with ganglioneuroma. Results: All patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma had abnormally elevated concentrations of either plasma metanephrine or normetanephrine. The patient with ganglioneuroma had normal plasma metanephrine levels, corresponding to a sensitivity of 91%. In two patients where pheochromocytoma was excluded, plasma metanephrin or normetanephrine was above the reference level, corresponding to a specificity of 99%. Urinary catecholamines were determined in 10 of 11 patients with a positive diagnosis, and all 10 showed elevated levels of either urinary epinephrine or norepinephrine, including the patient with ganglioneuroma (equivalent to a sensitivity of 100%). Seven patients, in whom pheochromocytoma was excluded, had elevated urinary catecholamines (equivalent to a specificity of 94%). Conclusion: Measurement of plasma free metanephrines by immunoassay appears to be a useful diagnostic test in patients suspected of pheochromocytoma, with a high specificity as compared with urinary catecholamines. The latter may result in fewer false-positive findings, an outcome which may be particularly troublesome.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mrs Susanne Sørensen and Mrs Hanne Petersen, who performed the analyses of metanephrine and nor-metanephrine. Central Denmark Region supported the study by a grant to Dr Trine Tang Christensen.

Funding: The authors have received a research grant from Region Midt.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.