282
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Differences in autonomic balance in patients with cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor type of reflex syncope during head-up tilt test and active standing

, , , &
Pages 265-273 | Received 01 Dec 2011, Accepted 28 Dec 2011, Published online: 14 Feb 2012
 

Abstract

Objective. To improve the pathophysiological understanding of cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor reflex syncope, by evaluating orthostatic effects on electrical and hemodynamic variables. To unravel the pathogeneses further, we studied these effects during both the passive head-up tilt test and the active standing test. Background. The current knowledge of the compromised autonomic balance in patients with reflex syncope is limited. The orthostatic responses to head-up tilt test in cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor patients differ, suggesting different pathogeneses; however, the more physiological active standing test represents daily life situations better. Methods. We included 74 patients; 36 cardioinhibitory and 38 vasodepressor. Patients were compared with respect to vascular hemodynamics and heart rate variability during the change from supine to upright position. Resting electrolytes, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (pro-ANP), and the C-terminal of pro-vasopressin, copeptin were measured. Results. Resting systolic blood pressure was higher in cardioinhibitory (117.8 ± 15.7 mmHg) than in vasodepressor patients (109.1 ± 15.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). Changes in heart rate tended to be smaller in cardioinhibitory patients (6.7 ± 9.8vs. 10.7 ± 8.9 bpm, p = 0.056). Heart rate variability was lower and changed less in cardioinhibitory patients (p < 0.05). Cardioinhibitory patients had higher pro-ANP levels (63.5 ± 18.8pM) compared to vasodepressor patients (54.2 ± 31.4 pM, p = 0.018). Responses during active standing were attenuated compared to head-up tilt in both groups. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that cardioinhibitory patients had higher blood pressure, attenuated hemodynamic responses, and reduced autonomic regulation compared to vasodepressor patients. Furthermore, cardioinhibitory patients showed a sympathetic predominance in their modulation of autonomic responses. Orthostatic responses induced by active standing were modest and did not sufficiently explain potential pathophysiological differences between cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor patients.

Acknowledgements

Funding sources: This work was supported by the John and Birthe Meyer Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmia, Copenhagen, Denmark; and The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark; Villadsen Family Foundation, Denmark.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.