442
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Liver and Biliary Disease

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: Analysis of patients with negative MRCP

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 217-224 | Received 16 Sep 2011, Accepted 31 Oct 2011, Published online: 08 Dec 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the negative predictive value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for common bile duct (CBD) stones and the prognosis of patients suspected to have choledocholithiasis in whom the MRCP was negative for CBD stones. Methods. We enrolled the patients suspected to have choledocholithiasis in whom the MRCP was negative for the CBD stones between January 2008 and March 2011 and retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 115 patients. Results. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 27 patients (23%, group 1), and none had CBD stones. The negative predictive value of MRCP was 100%. During a median follow-up of 18.3 months, acute cholangitis with newly developed CBD stones occurred in two patients. Eighty-eight patients (77%, group 2) did not undergo ERCP and all recovered from acute cholangitis without CBD surgery. During a median follow-up of 18.7 months, acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, and pancreatico-biliary cancers occurred in four (4.6%), three (3.5%), one (1.2%), and three (3.5%) patients, respectively. New CBD stones were found in only two patients among four patients with recurrent acute cholangitis. No patient had recurrent cholangitis caused by MRCP-missed CBD stones. The rates of recurrent cholangitis and cholangitis-free survival did not differ between groups 1 and 2. Conclusion. The negative predictive value of MRCP was very high. ERCP can be reserved for patients who are MRCP negative for choledocholithiasis, but close follow-up is needed because of recurrent cholangitis or pancreatico-biliary cancer.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.