422
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Gastrointestinal Cancer

Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric adenomatous polyps: predictive factors for early gastric cancer

, , , , &
Pages 1218-1225 | Received 21 Dec 2011, Accepted 06 Feb 2012, Published online: 30 Jul 2012
 

Abstract

Objective. Endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) sampling of gastric adenoma may provide inadequate specimens for a correct diagnosis and lead to inappropriate follow-up strategies for adenomas or missed carcinoma foci. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic concordance between an EFB and resected gastric adenomatous polyps by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and to know the efficacy of ESD for the treatment of gastric adenomatous polyps. Material and methods. Between November 2008 and May 2011, 413 ESDs were carried out at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. After exclusion, 282 cases were enrolled. The clinicopathological features, complete resection rate, procedure time, complication rate and associated factors for early gastric cancer (EGC) prediction were analyzed. Results. The mean age was 62.13 ± 8.91 years. Submucosal dissection results showed that the discrepancy rate between endoscopic biopsy and pathology of resected specimens was 32.9% (93/282). Additionally, 71 cases (25.2%) were adenocarcinomas. Among low-grade dysplasia (LGD) from EFB, 23 cases (11.8%) were adenocarcinomas after ESD. Among high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from EFB, 48 cases (55.2%) were adenocarcinomas after ESD. EFB procedure times were longer in the HGD group than in the LGD group (24.90 vs. 29.88 min, p = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, HGD from EFB, surface redness and lesion diameter were the significant predictive factors for EGC. Conclusions. Gastric adenomatous polyps should be removed by endoscopic resection regardless of histopathological type. ESD is a useful method for complete resection of gastric adenomas, regardless of size and location.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A091047).

Declaration of interest : The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.