143
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Contributions of History-Taking, Physical Examination, and Computer Assistance to Diagnosis of Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: A Prospective Study of 1333 Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain

, &
Pages 715-721 | Received 20 Sep 1993, Accepted 08 Jan 1994, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

EskelinenM, Ikonen J, LipponenP. Contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and computer assistance to diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction. A prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:715-721.

Background: The accuracy of clinical diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction was studied in connection with the survey of acute abdominal pain by the Research Committee of the World Organization of Gastroenterology (OMGE). Criteria for inclusion and the diagnostic criteria of this prospective study were those set out by the OMGE Research Committee. Methods: The clinical findings in each patient were recorded in detail on a pre-defined structured data collection sheet, and the collected data were compared with the final diagnosis of patients. Results: The most efficient symptoms in the diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction were previous abdominal surgery (relative risk (RR) equals; 12.1) and type of pain (colic/intermittent versus steady) (RR equals; 2.4). The most efficient clinical tests were abdominal distension (yes versus no) (RR equals; 13.1) and bowel sounds (abnormal versus normal) (RR equals; 9.0). The sensitivity of the clinical decision was 0.75, with a specificity of 0.99 and an efficiency of 0.98. The computer-based diagnostic score reached a sensitivity of 0.87 with a specificity of 0.95 and an efficiency of 0.95. Conclusions: Acute abdominal pain with distension, abnormal bowel sounds, and previous abdominal surgery are indicative of a small-bowel obstruction. A computer-based diagnostic score increases the sensitivity and usefulness index of the diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction in comparison with clinical decision alone.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.