17
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Non-Bleeding Visible Vessel Treatment: Perendoscopic Injection Therapy versus Omeprazole Infusion

, , , , , & show all
Pages 872-875 | Received 08 Feb 1994, Accepted 31 Dec 1994, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Background: The non-bleeding visible vessel in a peptic ulcer is the highest risk factor for a bleeding recurrence among not actively bleeding lesions. Perendoscopic injection of sclerosing compounds is usually used as prophylaxis against rebleeding.

Methods: Forty-two patients with visible vessels in a peptic ulcer at an emergency endoscopic procedure have been studied: 21 patients underwent prophylactic perendoscopic hemostasis, and 21 patients were infused with omeprazole intravenously.

Results: Eight patients (19%), four in each group, had early rebleeding (within 48 h after the enrollment). There was no significant difference between the two types of treatment. At the endoscopic control after 48 h there were significantly more lesions with higher risk of rebleeding (Forrest IIa and IIb) in the group treated with perendoscopic hemostasis.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that omeprazole infusion is a valid alternative to injection treatment of non-bleeding visible vessels.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.