30
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Evaluation of Pancreatic Function Development after Hydrolyzed Protein- Based and Soy-Based Formulas in Unweaned Infants

, , , , , & show all
Pages 273-277 | Received 09 Jul 1996, Accepted 22 Oct 1996, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Aims: Different protein sources could determine differences in the maturation of the exocrine pancreas in humans during the first months after birth; however, no studies have been carried out in man to evaluate the effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on exopancreatic function. Our aim was therefore to determine the effect of two different milk formulas on pancreatic secretion in patients with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA). Methods: We selected 12 infants (median age, 3.0 months), fed for 6 weeks with a hydrolyzed casein-based formula, and 14 infants (median age, 3.0 months) who received a soy-protein based formula over the same period. As controls, two groups of age-matched infants with no gastrointestinal disease and receiving a free diet were studied. In the patients with CMPA a secretin-cerulein test was performed at the commencement of the diet and after 6 weeks; in the controls the same test was performed only once. Enzyme concentrations and outputs of trypsin, chymotrypsin, lipasc, and phospholipase were assayed. Results: No significant difference was observed between the two groups of patients with CMPA for any of the enzymes studied, either at base line or after 6 weeks of diet. No difference was recorded between CMPA patients and age-matched controls on a free diet either. In both CMPA groups there was a significant increase over basal values in trypsin, chymotrypsin, and lipase concentrations after 6 weeks. Furthermore, there was a significant positive correlation between the age of the patients and enzyme concentrations. Mean daily weight gain was 27.4 ± 3.9 g with hydrolyzed casein and 27.2 ± 3.5 g in soy- fed patients. Conclusions: It is suggested that the diets with different protein content used in subjects with CMPA did not determine any difference in the stimulation of proteolytic and lipolytic pancreatic enzymes.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.