Short-term treatment of acute urinary tract infection in girls

Abstract

The efficiency of treatment of acute urinary tract infections with sulfamethizole for 3 days, sulfamethizole for 10 days, and pivmecillinam for 3 days was compared in a randomized multi-centre study comprising 264 girls aged 1–15 years. For ethical reasons children with complicated diseases were not included. In these treatment groups no significant growth after treatment was found in 81%, 77%, and 74%, respectively (NS). New bacteria after treatment were found less frequently after sulfamethizole for 3 days (4%) when compared to sulfamethizole for 10 days (14%) and pivmecillinam for 3 days (13%) (p=0.048). After pivmecillinam treatment 75% of new bacteria were Streptococcus faecalis versus 25% after sulfamethizole for 3 days and 18% after sulfamethizole for 10 days (p=0.016). In the subgroup with nephro-urological abnormalities no significant growth after treatment was found in 68% of the sulfamethizole 3-day treated group, 54% of the sulfamethizole 10-day treated group, and 67% of the pivmecillinam 3-day treated group (NS). All treatments resulted in a change in the bacterial sensitivity pattern when bacteria isolated 1–10 days after treatment was compared to those found before treatment. This was more pronounced after the 10-day treatment when compared to the 3-day treatment. The sensitivity patterns of the bacteria isolated from recurrences were similar to those seen before treatment. After treatment there was no difference in the actuarial percentage recurrence-free curves of the 3 treatment groups. Side effects were rare in the sulfamethizole treated groups, and seen more often in the pivmecillinam treated group. 3-day treatment with sulfamethizole or alternatively pivmecillinam is recommended as first choice for treatment of uncomplicated acute urinary tract infections in girls.