Abstract
Quantitative analytical findings on upper urinary tract stones from 500 patients are reported and compared to data in the literature. Methods of presentation of quantitative data are discussed. A wide range of findings between recurrent stones in the same patient and between stones from patients with the same cause of stone formation was found. No immediate clinical value of quantitation can be seen, but larger materials and correlation with metabolic investigations in stone formers may reveal correlations of clinical interest. Quantitative observations may identify groups of patients and types of stones not recognised on the basis of qualitative analysis. Examples of this are given for calcium oxalate–calcium phosphate stones and for stones containing brushite.