230
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
UrologyOriginal Articles

Nerve-sparing procedure in radical prostatectomy: A risk factor for hernia repair following open retropubic, pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures

, , , , &
Pages 164-170 | Received 17 Sep 2010, Accepted 05 Nov 2010, Published online: 08 Feb 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. To identify risk factors for hernia repair following open retropubic, pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Material and methods. The medical records of 632 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy (open retropubic n = 430, pure laparoscopic n = 49, and robot-assisted laparoscopic n = 202) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with postprostatectomy inguinal hernia were defined as those who had undergone subsequent hernia repair. The mean period of follow-up was 19.5 months (median 19, range 1 to 42). Results. Hernia repairs were performed in 27 of the 632 patients (4.3%). The site of the repair was right in 15 patients (55.6%), left in 9 patients (33.3%), and bilateral in 3 patients (11.1%). The timing of the hernia repair ranged from 4 to 35 months (mean 13.1) following radical prostatectomy. No difference in hernia-repair-free rates was observed between the extraperitoneal open and transperitoneal pure or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy procedures (p = 0.225, log-rank test). The log-rank test revealed that the nerve sparing procedure (p = 0.019) and the absence of diabetes (p = 0.017) were significant risk factors for postprostatectomy hernia repair. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, neurovascular bundle saving was the only significant risk factor for postprostatectomy inguinal hernia repair (Hazard ratio, 2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 6.41, p = 0.032). Conclusions. These findings suggest that the nerve sparing procedure may increase the risk of hernia repair. Prospective studies are warranted to investigate the possible adverse effects of the nerve sparing technique.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.