191
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Do we use the right criteria for determining the clinical significance of incidental prostate cancer at radical cystoprostatectomy?

, &
Pages 358-362 | Received 12 Feb 2012, Accepted 15 Aug 2012, Published online: 18 Oct 2012
 

Abstract

Prostate-sparing techniques have been advocated to improved functional outcomes after radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP) for invasive bladder cancer, but this may endanger the oncological outcome. This review addresses the current status of risk factors of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence in patients with incidental PCa after RCP. The overall 7-year risk of PCa recurrence after RCP is approximately 9%. Increased risk has been suggested in the presence of clinically significant PCa as: ≥pT3a stage, presence of lymph-node metastasis, positive surgical margins, Gleason pattern ≥4, tumour multifocality (three or more foci) and tumour volume >0.5 cm3. However, the prognostic significance of these parameters has not been evaluated within multivariable analyses so far. Preoperatively elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values correlate weakly with the clinical significance of incidental PCa, while prostate biopsy has a limited accuracy for detecting incidental PCa in the preoperative setting. Genetic markers, e.g. the prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) gene, have recently been associated with risk of recurrence in patients with incidental PCa. Incidental PCa at RCP is usually clinically insignificant. Yet, clinicopathological parameters for clinical significant cancers have not been investigated independently in the literature so far. Consequently, lifelong PSA surveillance should be conducted in all patients with incidental PCa after RCP. In the presence of clinically significant PCa treatment decisions should be based not only on histological criteria but also on patient-centred parameters (e.g. patient age and comorbidities). Assessment of PSCA expression in RCP specimens may enable improved risk assessment for PCa recurrence after RCP.

Declaration of interest: None of the authors has anything to disclose.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.