Publication Cover
Xenobiotica
the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems
Volume 46, 2016 - Issue 7
175
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Animal Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism

Pharmacokinetics of isoforskolin after administration via different routes in guinea pigs

, , , , &
Pages 620-626 | Received 12 Aug 2015, Accepted 19 Sep 2015, Published online: 02 Nov 2015
 

Abstract

1. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of isoforskolin after oral, intraperitoneal and intravenous administration, as well as to compare bioavailability.

2. Isoforskolin was administered to guinea pigs at a dose of 2 mg/kg. Plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–ESI–MS/MS) method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by a noncompartmental method. A compartment model was also adopted to describe the pharmacokinetic profiles.

3. The pharmacokinetic behavior of intravenously administered isoforskolin was characterized by rapid and extensive distribution (Vz = 16.82 ± 8.42 L/kg) followed by rapid elimination from the body (Cl = 9.63 ± 4.21 L/kg/h). After intraperitoneal administration, isoforskolin was absorbed rapidly (Tmax = 0.12 ± 0.05 h). The pharmacokinetic profiles of isoforskolin were similar after intraperitoneal and intravenous administration, except for the concentrations at the initial sampling times. Isoforskolin was also absorbed rapidly following oral dosing; however, the concentration–time data were best fit to a one-compartment model, which was different from that observed after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration. Following intraperitoneal and oral administration, the absolute bioavailability of isoforskolin was 64.12% and 49.25%, respectively.

4. Isoforskolin is a good candidate for oral administration because of its good oral bioavailability.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality provided financial support (13401900502) to this study.

Supplementary material available online.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.