10
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

High-Frequency Air-Conduction and Electric Bone-Conduction Audiometry: Comparison of Two Methods

&
Pages 175-180 | Received 29 Oct 1990, Accepted 19 Dec 1990, Published online: 12 Oct 2009
 

Abstract

Threshold values for 147 subjects (9-43 years old) were measured with a high-frequency (HF) air-conduction (AC) (Inter-acoustics AS 10 HF) and an electric bone-conduction (EBC) (Audimax 500) audiometer. In addition, the reproducibility of these methods was studied in another group of 24 subjects. The results confirmed the previous findings of Økstad et al. (1988) that the electric current (i) used as a stimulus in the Audimax 500 audiometer can be converted into decibels with a correction factor of 40 log (i) re 1 mA as Tonndorf & Kurman (1984) have proposed. However, an additive frequency-dependent correction is needed to obtain similar loudress sensation increases with these audiometers. Reproducibility with the EBC audiometer was better than with the AC audiometer, especially in the HF range.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.