Age-Based Comparison of Successful Probing in Nepalese Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the success rates of probing in Nepalese children younger than 2 years versus children older than 2 years with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), and to identify factors associated with successful probing.

Materials and Methods: Data was collected and analyzed retrospectively on children who underwent probing under general anesthesia for NLDO at Tilganga Eye Centre, Nepal, from May 2004 to October 2008. We compared successful probing rates in children less than or equal to 2 years old (group 1) versus children greater than 2 years old (group 2), and analyzed whether various clinical factors were associated with successful probing. Successful probing was defined as complete resolution of all clinical signs (discharge, epiphora or increased tear lake) at the outcome visit one month following surgery.

Results: Data on 84 children (109 eyes) was reviewed. The mean age of children in group 1 and group 2 was 15.3 months and 37.3 months, respectively. The success rate of probing for the overall sample was 82.6% (90/109 eyes). The success rate in group 1 was 90.2% (55/61 eyes), and 72.9% (35/48 eyes) in group 2 (p=0.018). Increased age at time of probing (p=0.031) and duration of symptoms (p=0.027) were associated with decreased probing success.

Conclusion: Early treatment of NLDO with probing, ideally prior to 2 years, is associated with better outcomes. Age appropriate intervention may reduce the incidence of complications from NLDO, which is highly prevalent in the low-lying areas of Nepal, including Kathmandu.

Keywords::

• Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
• Nasolacrimal duct probing
• Success rate age
• Nepal

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Mr. Robert Dashwood from Australia, and Dr. Josephine-Liezl Cueto and Dr. Rachel E. Peck from Pennsylvania, USA, for their tremendous support during this study.

Declaration of interest: The authors do not declare any conflicts of interest in carrying out this study; no funding was received or required.