Ultrastructural Immunolabeling in the Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Characterization of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasia represents a heterogenous entity with variable morphologic light microscopic expressions. In many cases a definite diagnosis is easily made by light microscopic examination, but in some cases this does not suffice. In the latter instances, immunocytochemistry, ultrastructural examination, or both are required to diagnose a neuroendocrine neoplasm. However, basing a diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasia exclusively on the results obtained from immunocytochemical or ultrastructural evaluation of these tumors may not be entirely accurate in some instances. Ultrastructural immunolabeling plays a key role in accurately defining localization of immunoreactive substances in well-characterized neuroendocrine neoplasms, can assess colocalization of antigenic epitopes, helps define specificity and significance of immunocytochemistry results obtained at the light microscopic level, and is more sensitive than light microscopic immunocytochemistry. Some evolving diagnostic entities can be further characterized by utilization of ultrastructural labeling techniques. Controversies concerning the neuroendocrine nature of electron-dense structures identifiable at the ultrastructural level can be readily and accurately resolved. By providing a way to evaluate combined immunomorphologic parameters, ultrastructural immunogold labeling can settle important questions pertaining to neuroendocrine neoplasia. The present article illustrates a series of cases where the above-mentioned applications were tested.

Key Words:

• electron microscopy techniques
• immunogold
• neuroendocrine neoplasms
• ultrastructural labeling