72
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of two commercial brands of microcrystalline cellulose for extrusion-spheronization

, , &
Pages 713-723 | Received 29 Jul 1996, Accepted 19 Sep 1996, Published online: 26 Jun 2009
 

Abstract

Two commercial brands of microcrystalline cellulose, the widely used AviceI® PH-101 and the newly available Pharmacel® 101, were compared for aqueous extrusion-spheronization of a model mix with lactose. Based on the results of multi-level experiments employing pellet size analysis by sieving and sphericity determination by image analysis, Avicel was shown to be less adversely affected by variation in added water or speed of spheronization. Physicochemical testing of powder samples from both brands was carried out using laser particle size analysis, density determinations, differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray diffraction studies. The results indicated that the improved ease of processing with Avicel may be related to its smaller particle size with less aggregates, improved flow, lower depolymerization temperature range and absence of traces of cellulose II in its cellulose I content.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.