A comparison between the effect of step-down heating in a tumour and a normal tissue in vivo

Abstract

A comparison between the effect of step-down heating (SDH) obtained in a C3H mammary carcinoma grown in the feet of CDFl mice and the skin of normal CDFl feet is presented. Water-bath heating was used, and SDH was obtained by giving a 44.7°C/10 min treatment followed by heating at 42.2°C for variable times. Single heating at 42.2°C and step-up heating (SUH), i.e. 42.2°C followed by 44.7°C/10 min, were used as controls. The endpoint was the heating time at 42.2°C to obtain either a definite tumour growth time (TGT50) or a specific skin score level (RD50) in 50% of the animals. The effect of SDH and SUH was quantified by the step-down ratio (SDR), calculated as the ratio of the heating times at 42–2°C to obtain the specific endpoint. In both assays the effect of SDH was seen as a significant left shift of the SDH dose-response curve compared to the curve for single heating and SUH. For the comparison of the tumour and the normal tissue response, damage levels with comparable heating times for single heating were used. The therapeutic effect was then investigated by calculating the therapeutic gain factor (TGF), where TGF = SDR(tumour)/SDR(normal tissue). Neither SUH nor SDH gave a TGF significantly different from 1. The results suggest that SDH may be used clinically to shorten the heating time without decreasing the therapeutic effect.

Key Words:

• Step-down heating
• hyperthermia
• C3H mammary carcinoma
• normal tissue
• therapeutic effect