Effect of I.V. Glucose Versus Combined I.V. Plus Oral Glucose on Human Tumour Extracellular Ph for Potential Sensitization to Thermoradiotherapy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether intravenous or combined intravenous plus oral glucose administration was more effective inducing acute tumour acidification. Seventeen nondiabetic patients at the Henan Tumour Hospital with superficial tumour deposits of various histologies and size were administered, after fasting, either 50 g glucose intravenously (I.V., in 100ml over 10 min) or 50 g I.V. glucose (in 100 ml over 10 min) combined with 100 g oral glucose (in 200 ml; I.V. + oral). Extracellular tumour pH (pH_e) was determined with one or two indwelling needle combination pH microelectrodes. Blood glucose concentration was determined every 15–20 min by finger stick with Chem-Strips^TM and a Glucometer^TM. Ten patients received I.V. glucose, and seven patients recieved I.V. + oral glucose. Blood glucose rose to 430 ± 15 mg/dL in both groups. However, the rate of clearance of blood glucose was greater for the I.V. glucose than for the I.V. + oral glucose group (p < 0.00002), and thus the blood glucose levels remained elevated longer after I.V. + oral than after I.V. glucose administration. Relative to the initial fasting blood glucose concentration, blood glucose was -2 ± 7 mg/dL at 110 min after glucose administration by the I.V. route, whereas, blood glucose relative to initial values was 143 + 23 mg/dL by 110 min after glucose administration by the I.V. + oral route, p = 0.000004. The initial pH_e values in the two groups of tumours were similar, 7.34 ± 0.09 (6.78–7.71) and 7.35 ±0.08 (6.99–7.61), respectively. After I.V. glucose, tumour acidification occurred in nine of ten patients (-0.16 + 0.02 pH unit, range -0.24 to -0.05), and after I.V. + oral glucose tumour acidification occurred in six of seven patients (-0.19 ± 0.07 pH unit, range -0.43 to -0.06). When the initial fasting blood glucose concentration was in excess of 82 mg/dL, all patients (12/ 12) exhibited tumour acidification during hyperglycaemia, whereas, only 3/5 patients exhibited tumour acidification when the initial blood glucose concentration was less than 82 mg/dL (p = 0.07). The time to maximum decrease in tumour pH_e was significantly shorter after I.V. + oral glucose than after I.V. glucose (e.g., 67 ±11 versus 102 ± 8 min, p = 0.02) and correlated with the rate of clearance of blood glucose (p = 0.02, r = 0.55). Larger tumours tended to exhibit a greater decrease in pH_e (p = 0.08, r = 0.04). The only side effects of hyperglycaemia were transient nausea and increased urinary output. The effect of hyperglycaemia induced by administration of 200 g oral glucose was similar to I.V. administration in that 83% of tumours exhibited acidification of 0.14 ± 0.02 pH unit by 91 ± 7 min. We conclude that I.V. and I.V. + oral glucose administration are equally effective inducing tumour acute acidification, but no more effective than 200 g oral glucose, for investigation of hyperglycemic sensitization to thermoradiotherapy.

Key Words:

• Tumour pH
• hyperglycaemia
• thermoradiotherapy
• hyperthermia sensitization