510
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Post-operative day two versus day seven mobilization after burr-hole drainage of subacute and chronic subdural haematoma in Nigerians

, &
Pages 743-746 | Received 17 Oct 2011, Accepted 30 Apr 2012, Published online: 21 Aug 2012
 

Abstract

Introduction. The traditional care of patients with subacute/chronic subdural haematoma (S/CSDH) often involves delayed mobilization after burr-hole drainage. It is thought that delayed mobilization aids brain re-expansion thereby reducing the risk of recurrence. However, there is paucity of information regarding its efficacy and safety over early mobilization. We evaluated the efficacy and complications of each type of mobilization following burr-hole drainage of S/CSDH. Method. This was a prospective study from October 2004 and September 2010. A total of 50 patients who had burr-hole drainage of S/CSDH were sequentially allocated to either early (day 2) or late (day 7) mobilization (EM or LM) groups (25 patients in each group). Wound related complications, recurrence of haematoma, complications of prolonged bed rest and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge were studied in the two groups. Patients who could not obey commands to mobilize in the early post-operative period were excluded. Results. There were 43 (86%) males and 7 (14%) females. The mean age was 57 years (range: 27–90 years). Fourteen (28%) of the patients were elderly (age > 65 years). Two complications, wound infection in a 76-year old man in the LM group and tension pneumocephalus requiring re-opening burr-hole drainage in a 55-year old man in the EM group were recorded. There was no recurrence or problem associated with prolonged bed rest in the two groups. Five (10%) patients had moderate disability (GOS 4) at discharge (1 EM, 4 LM) while the others (90%) had good recovery (GOS 5) (24 EM, 21 LM). These differences were not statistically significant (p-value: 0.349). Conclusion. It appears that both EM and LM are equally beneficial in the post-operative care of patients following burr-hole drainage of S/CSDH. There is no significant complication referable to the specific type of mobilization. The authors, therefore, advocate EM of patients to reduce the length of hospital stay.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.