560
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How fluent is the fluent speech of people who stutter? A new approach to measuring kinematics with ultrasound

, , &
Pages 292-312 | Received 15 Feb 2015, Accepted 22 Sep 2015, Published online: 23 Nov 2015
 

ABSTRACT

We present a new approach to the investigation of dynamic ultrasound tongue imaging (UTI) data, applied here to analyse the subtle aspects of the fluency of people who stutter (PWS). Fluent productions of CV syllables (C = /k/; V = /ɑ, i, ə/) from three PWS and three control speakers (PNS) were analysed for duration and peak velocity relative to articulatory movement towards (onset) and away from (offset) the consonantal closure. The objective was to apply a replicable methodology for kinematic investigation to speech of PWS in order to test Wingate’s Fault-Line hypothesis. As was hypothesised, results show comparable onset behaviours for both groups. Regarding offsets, groups differ in peak velocity. Results suggest that PWS do not struggle initiating consonantal closure (onset). In transition from consonantal closure into the vowel, however, groups appear to employ different strategies expressed in increased variation (PNS) versus decreased mean peak velocity (PWS).

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants who gave up their time to complete the experiment. Special thanks go to Alan Wrench, Patrycja Strycharczuk, Steve Cowen, Ian Finlayson and Jana Walzog for their constant support. We gratefully acknowledge the support of Queen Margaret University, particularly the Clinical Audiology, Speech and Language Research Centre.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Notes

1. The script settings were the following: minimum pitch 60 Hz, time steps: 0 s, silence threshold: –25 dB, minimum silent interval duration: 0.3 s, minimum sounding interval duration: 0.1 s.

2. Including the interaction between prompt type and speaker group did not improve model fit.

3. Again, including the interaction between prompt type and speaker group did not improve model fit.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.