651
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effects of Isoproterenol and Cholera Toxin on Human Limbal Epithelial Cell Cultures

, , , , , & show all
Pages 644-653 | Received 09 Sep 2011, Accepted 10 Feb 2012, Published online: 04 May 2012
 

Abstract

Purpose: Cholera toxin and isoproterenol (β-adrenergic receptor agonist) are largely used to enhance cell proliferation. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of cholera toxin and isoproterenol on growth and differentiation of cells cultured from human superficial limbal explants.

Methods: Limbal epithelial cells were cultured from superficial limbal explantsin basal medium either supplemented with cholera toxin or isoproterenol for 3 weeks. Growth kinetics and morphometry were studied by light and confocal microscopy. Progenitor and differentiated epithelial cell markers were studied by immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, Colony Formation Assay, and reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction.

Results: Cell proliferation was significantly higher with 0.5 µg/ml (p = 0.049), 1 µg/ml (p = 0.005), and 2 µg/ml (p = 0.008) isoproterenol whereas, cholera toxin and 4 µg/ml isoproterenol did not significantly increase cell proliferation. Multilayered epithelial cell sheets were obtained in all culture conditions. Addition of isoproterenol resulted in smaller cell size (p < 0.05) 14 days after cells were cultured, whereas cholera toxin had no effects. Strong expression of cytokeratins 3 and 4/5/6/8/10/13/18 and lower expression of cytokeratin 19, vimentin, and Delta N p63α were observed after 3 weeks of culture with no significant differences in the percentage of positive cells according to culture medium. Colony-forming efficiencies were observed after 2 weeks in all culture condition but not after 3 weeks.

Conclusion: Isoproterenol was more efficient than cholera toxin for enhancing cell proliferation and resulted in smaller cell size. It appears to be useful and safe for growing human limbal epithelial progenitors from limbal explants with no feeders before transplantation to patients with limbal deficiency.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.