380
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Inappropriate Techniques Used by Internal Medicine Residents with Three Kinds of Inhalers (a Metered Dose Inhaler, Diskus, and Turbuhaler): Changes after a Single Teaching Session

, M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D. & , M.D. show all
Pages 944-950 | Published online: 11 Nov 2009
 

Abstract

Background. While initial education and regular evaluation of inhaler technique in patients are emphasized in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, health care professionals are not experienced in using inhalers. This study assessed whether internal medicine residents used common inhalers correctly and whether a single teaching session successfully improved their performance. Methods. We evaluated 142 internal medicine residents from six university hospitals in Korea for their techniques with three different inhaler devices: a metered dose inhaler (MDI), Diskus, and Turbuhaler. We assessed whether participants completed each step in using the three inhalers and classified overall performance as good, adequate, or inadequate for each inhaler type. To estimate the effect of a single teaching session, reassessment was performed 2 months after education. Results. Performance grade was inadequate for 50.7% of participants with a MDI, 43.0% for Diskus, and 51.4% for Turbuhaler. An early year of residency was associated significantly with inappropriate technique for Diskus (p = 0.003), but not for MDI and Turbuhaler. After a single teaching session, overall skills improved significantly for all three inhalers. The proportion of subjects with good or adequate skill changed notably from 39.7% to 83.8% for MDI (p = 0.001), from 50.0% to 86.8% for Diskus (p = 0.001), and from 44.1% to 88.2% for Turbuhaler (p = 0.001). Conclusions. These findings demonstrate that a high proportion of internal medicine residents cannot use inhalers correctly and just a single teaching can effectively enhance their inhaler technique.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Asthma Allergy Foundation and the Korea 21 R&D project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, R.O.K. (A030001).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.