![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background. Eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels have been proposed as markers of disease activity; however, the usefulness of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN)—another eosinophil granular protein—as a marker in pediatric asthma has not been established. Objective. The authors compared the concentrations of blood eosinophil counts (TECs), serum ECP, and serum EDN to asthma symptom severity in young children. Methods. Forty-three young children with asthma (Asthma group: mean age, 2.9 years; range, 1.4–5.0 years) were evaluated during both the acute and stable phases of disease. Asthma severity was measured using a symptom-scoring technique, and serum eosinophil indices (EDN and ECP levels and TECs) were determined. Nineteen age-matched controls (Control group: mean age, 2.7 years; range, 1.0–5.0 years) were used for comparison. Results. Levels of serum EDN, serum ECP, and TECs were significantly higher in children with acute asthma compared with Controls (p < .0001). However, in stable asthma only EDN and ECP levels differed significantly when compared to Controls (p < .0001 and p < .001, respectively). When comparing acute and stable phases, EDN and TECs differed significantly (p < .0001), whereas ECP did not. Symptom scores correlated significantly with EDN (r = 0.850, p < 0.0001), ECP (r = 0.374, p < 0.01) and TECs (r = 0.457, p < 0.01) in acute asthma patients. When symptom scores were divided into three subgroups based on severity, only EDN levels showed significant differences amongst the three groups. Conclusion. These findings suggest that serum EDN is a useful marker for identifying disease activity in children with asthma. EDN levels may better reflect disease severity than ECP levels or total eosinophil counts.