477
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Diagnostic Approaches

Detection of the Airway Obstruction Stage in Asthma Using Impulse Oscillometry System

, M.Med., , B.Med., , M.Med., , B.Med., , M.Med., , M.Med. & , M.D. show all
Pages 45-51 | Published online: 28 Nov 2012
 

Abstract

Objective. Although spirometry is the most common method for evaluating the airway obstruction stage in asthma patients, it is difficult to perform in some patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether impulse oscillometry, an easy-to-perform technique, can detect asthmatic airway obstruction stage. Methods. A total of 80 subjects, including healthy volunteers and patients with asthma, were enrolled in this study. The asthma patients were classified into three groups according to American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)-2005: the mild group (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥ 70% predicted (Pred), n = 20), the moderate group (50% Pred ≤ FEV1 <70% Pred, n = 20), and the severe group (FEV1 < 50% Pred, n = 20). Spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) parameters were obtained from every subject. Correlation analysis was used to compare spirometry measurements and IOS parameters. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare IOS parameters among different groups. The potential of using all individual IOS parameters to detect the different stages of asthmatic airway obstruction was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results. The correlation analysis showed that IOS parameters, such as respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5), respiratory resistance at 10 Hz (R10), respiratory resistance at 20 Hz (R20), difference in resistance between 5 Hz and 20 Hz (R5–20), impedance at 5 Hz (Z5), resonant frequency (Fres), and area of reactance (AX) were negatively correlated with FEV1 and peak expiratory flow (PEF), while reactance at 5 Hz (X5) was positively correlated with FEV1 and PEF. The increase in R5, R10, R20, Z5, R5–20, Fres, (−X5), and AX parameters corresponded significantly with an increase in the airway obstruction stage, as determined by one-way ANOVA . ROC curve analysis revealed that all the IOS parameters studied, except for Fres, were capable of classifying asthmatic airway obstruction. R5, R5–20, and Z5 were the most accurate parameters. Conclusion. IOS provides an accurate, reliable, and patient-friendly technique for classifying asthmatic airway obstruction.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.